RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04029 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show she transferred her Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to her dependent while on active duty. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unaware that her 2 Feb 10 request for transfer of educational benefits (TEB) to her dependent daughter was denied. Her daughter is attending college and she would like to be able to use this benefit for her education. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 14 Sep 92. On 31 Jan 13, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, retired effective 1 Feb 13, and was credited with 20 years, 4 months, and 17 days of active service. As the applicant served on active duty since 11 Sep 01, she is entitled to Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits in her own right. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Based on the applicant’s total active federal military service date (TAFMSD), she would have incurred a 4-year obligation with TEB approval in accordance with AFI 36-2306, Voluntary Education Program, Attachment 9, A9.18.1.4.1. The applicant applied for TEB on two occasions. The first request for TEB was on 2 Feb 10, and was rejected 14 Aug 10, for failure to obtain the 4-year retainability, and sign the statement of understanding (SOU). The applicant resubmitted the TEB application on 13 Oct 10, and the application was rejected on 3 Nov 10 for failure to obtain the required retainability. The applicant applied for retirement on 3 Apr 12, was approved on 7 May 12, and retired on 1 Feb 13. The applicant failed to get the necessary retainability for TEB and was therefore disapproved. There is no error or injustice on the part of the Air Force. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Feb 15, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04029 in Executive Session on 14 Jul 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04029 was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Sep 14, w/atch. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 15 Dec 14, w/atchs. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Feb 15.