RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States, with an effective date of separation of 31 May 55 be changed to reflect 31 May 59. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His discharge date is wrong. He was discharged on 31 May 59. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects he served on active duty from 25 Apr 55 to 31 May 55, and was credited with one month and seven days of active service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not provided any evidence to support his discharge date was recorded incorrectly on his DD Form 214. There is no evidence in his master personnel record showing his discharge date was erroneously recorded. Without documentation to substantiate the applicant’s separation date is incorrect on the DD Form 214 there is no basis to correct the form. However, if applicant provides proof of active duty through 31 May 59 DPSIPV will direct a correction to his DD Form 214. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Apr 15, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD: After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36- 2603. The applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits. Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file in a timely manner. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04355 in Executive Session on 14 Jul 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04355 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Oct 14, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 2 Mar 15. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Apr 15.