RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 				DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04526

 						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru TSgt), for 
the period ending 1 June 2014 be amended in Section II, Job 
Description, Item 2, Significant Duty(s) to include “Weapons 
Program Manager, Fraud Program Manager, Equipment Custodian and 
Non-Embedded RDF.”


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His leadership did not list all of his additional duties on his 
EPR.  His previous EPR’s reflect the additional duties.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently on active duty in the Regular Air 
Force in the grade of Technical Sergeant (TSgt, E-6).


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial as the applicant has not exhausted 
all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking 
correction of his military records.  If the administrative 
appeal is not successful, the applicant may resubmit the DD Form 
149, Application for Correction of Military Records, and the 
results of the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) 
administrative review for processing to the AFBCMR.  

Under the provisions of AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for 
Correction of Military Records, the AFBCMR is the highest level 
of administrative appeal within the Department of the Air Force. 
The AFBCMR will not consider a case until all avenues of 
administrative relief have been exhausted.  DPSID recommends the 
applicant submit a new AF Form 948, Application for 
Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports, with all required 
supporting documentation through the Virtual Military Personnel 
Flight vMPF/Evaluation Appeals found under the Most Popular 
Applications.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 25 March 2015 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  In this 
respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level 
of appeal within the Air Force.  As such, an applicant must 
first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief 
provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief 
before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force 
Instruction.  The Air Force office of primary responsibility has 
reviewed this application and indicated there is an available 
avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not first 
pursued.  In view of this, we find this application is not ready 
for adjudication at this level as there exists a subordinate 
level of appeal that has not first been depleted.  Therefore, in 
view of the above, we find no basis to recommend granting the 
relief sought in this application. 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that he has not exhausted all 
available avenues of administrative relief prior to submitting 
his application to the AFBCMR; and the application will only be 
reconsidered upon exhausting all subordinate avenues of 
administrative relief.  

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-04526 in Executive Session on 8 July 2015 under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 4 March 2015.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 March 2015.