RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He wants his discharge upgraded to receive health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs. He is a model citizen and would like an opportunity to better himself. He also would like to be recognized for his service. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 24 Aug 92, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the Regular Air Force. On 15 Aug 94, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct. The reasons for the discharge action included one incident of reporting late for duty, sexually harassing a female co-worker, stealing from a fellow airman, violation of a regulation, failure to make timely payments on an Air Force Exchange Credit Card, and possessing an altered identification card, which he knew had been altered, for which he received one letter of counseling , one letter of reprimand, and two non-judicial punishment actions under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. On 15 Aug 94, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the discharge notification action. The legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient and recommended discharge with a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. The discharge authority concurred with the findings and recommendations and directed the applicant be furnished a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. On 26 Aug 94, the applicant was furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge, and was credited with two years and three days of active service. On 14 Dec 14, a request for post-service information and a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) background check was forwarded to the applicant (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the commander's discretionary authority. The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence for us to consider in determining whether or not the applicant’s activities since leaving the service are sufficient to overcome the misconduct for which he was discharged, we are not inclined to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend granting the relief sought. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04966 in Executive Session on 12 Aug 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04966 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Dec 14. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Dec 14, w/atch. 3 4