RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-05183 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, effective 7 February 2004, be corrected to reflect a list of countries in the Area of Responsibility (AOR) where he served, to include the respective years. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 lists the operations he participated in; however, the countries are not annotated. He is applying for a job which requires documentation of his deployments to Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. If given this documentation, he will be able to provide a better life for his wife and daughter. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he served in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of senior airman (E-4) during the matter under review. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial. After a thorough review of the applicant’s personnel records and provided source documents, there is no evidence of an error or injustice within his military records. The DD Form 214 certifies the military member’s release or discharge from active duty and captures item by item, by authority, the military member’s pertinent data and military service data. In accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3202, Separation Documents, the remarks section of the applicant’s DD Form 214, correctly shows the area of responsibility (AOR) along with the annotations of precise dates he served. The DD Form 214 does not document the actual locations visited while in the AOR. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 February 2015 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. While there is no evidence indicating the applicant’s DD Form 214 is incorrect, should the applicant have documentation that validates the location(s) where he specifically served in the area of responsibility (AOR), we advise he submit those documents as verification to his potential employers. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-05183 in Executive Session on 6 May 2016 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-05183 was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 December 2014, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, ARPC/DPTS, dated 16 January 2015. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 February 2015