RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-00321 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 12f, Foreign Service, Block 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons, and Block 18, Remarks, be corrected to reflect all Foreign Service and all Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons awarded. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His first overseas tour was three months and four days. His second overseas tour was eight months and nine days. Therefore, Foreign Service on his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect 11 months and 13 days. He previously tried to correct these errors; however, the Florida Air National Guard never correctly completed his request. In support of his request, the applicant has provided copies of overseas orders and copies of his service record. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Air National Guard on 7 Aug 01. On 6 Aug 08, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, and was credited with seven years total service for pay. The applicant’s NGB Form 22 reflects the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - National Defense Service Medal - Iraq Campaign Medal with one Service Star - Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal - Global War on Terrorism Service Medal - Air Force Longevity Service Award - Armed Force Reserve Medal with “M” Device - Air Force Overseas Ribbon - Short Tour with two Oak Leaf Clusters - Air Force Training Ribbon - Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with Gold Board and two Oak Leaf Clusters - Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with three Oak Leaf Clusters - Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor and four Devices - Air Reserve Forces Meritorious Service Medal with one Oak Leaf Cluster - Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Service Star The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. They conducted a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel records and the source documents provided. In accordance with AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, Chapter 2, paragraph 2.2.3, the DD Form 214 provides separating members with brief, clear records of their active military service at the time they are transferred, released, discharged or retired. The end date of the member’s DD Form 214 in question is Jun 2, 2008 and the Foreign Service annotated on that specific DD Form 214 is correct. Foreign Service does not reflect all Foreign Service for the member’s entire career; but only that time frame. Furthermore, without source documents such as certificates and citations, they cannot add any additional Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons to his record. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Sep 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00321 in Executive Session on 20 Oct 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00321 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Jan 15Y, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPTS, dated 4 Aug 15. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Sep 15.