RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS. IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-00560 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 27, Reentry (RE) code, be corrected to allow reentry into the Air Force Reserves. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received a RE code of “4G” which suggests he never earned his five skill level in his primary Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC). When in fact he earned it by the time he was a Senior Airman (E- 4). He was medically disqualified from a Class III AFSC for two years due to a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). He was selected to retrain into the 1B4x1 career field and opted instead to separate so he could get a degree in Engineering. He is currently looking to join the Air Force Reserves; however, is unable due to his erroneous RE code. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 12 Apr 11. On 10 Jun 13, the applicant’s supervisory completed AF Form 2096, Classification/On-The-Job Training Action, and verified he had completed all requirements for his five skill level upgrade, effective 4 Jun 13. On 21 Mar 14, the applicant’s aviation service was terminated by Aeronautical Order - 0943. According to the Flight Surgeon, it had been determined his incapacitation will not be resolved before the 366th day. On 1 Apr 14, the applicant signed AF Form 2096 which withdrew his Primary AFSC and classified him as a 9A000. Within the remarks section of the document the applicant initialed the following statement: “Upon disqualification approval, provided I am otherwise eligible for retraining, I have 30 days to submit a retraining applicant.” On 10 Sep 14, the applicant’s Voluntary Separation Application was approved. On 15 Oct 14, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, and was credited with three years, six months, and four days of active service. The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 27, Reentry Code, lists “4G” which is defined as “No AFSC skill level commensurate with grade.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant received a five skill level in the 1A3x1 AFSC on 4 Jun 13. He was then medically disqualified and had his AFSC withdrawn effective 19 Mar 14. He applied for miscellaneous separation in lieu of retraining and was separated on 15 Oct 14 with an Honorable characterization of service. Since he chose not to complete retraining to obtain qualification in another AFSC, his received a RE code of “4G”. The applicant’s RE code of “4G” is accurate as his AFSC was withdrawn and the definition of that code is: “applies to members who do not have an AFSC commensurate with grade making them ineligible for reenlistment”. He was ineligible for reenlistment because he did not have an AFSC commensurate with grade; this does not mean he never had an AFSC commensurate with grade at an earlier point. His DD Form 214, Block 11, Primary Specialty, identified he was at one time awarded the 1A3x1 AFSC with a 5 skill level. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluations was forwarded to the applicant on 2 Jul 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00560 in Executive Session on 15 Sep 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00560 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Feb 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 15 Apr 15. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 15.