RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS. IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-00662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be paid Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) I for the period of 9 June 2014 through 11 July 2014. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was on continuous orders from 9 June 2014 through 23 February 2015. She should be entitled to BAH I for the duration of those orders. She was on MPA Non-Contingency orders from 9 through 30 June 2014. She was on Annual Training Orders from 1 through 11 July 2014. She was on MPA Contingency Orders from 12 July 2014 through 23 February 2015. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a member of the Air National Guard serving in the grade of staff sergeant. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-IN recommends approval [sic]. The applicant has requested payment for Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) type I from 9 June 2014 through 11 July 2014. This rate is based on the zip code for the applicant’s home of record. The applicant was paid BAH type II, table rate based on rank, for Non-Contingency Orders and Annual Training Orders for the period in question. The rate paid for the period in question is correct as per Department of Defense Finance Management Regulation. The applicant’s status is the determining factor when paid for BAH. The applicant’s orders are not for a continuous period, but have a one-day break. The applicant did not start Contingency Orders until 12 July 2014; there is no entitlement to the higher rate of BAH until that date. The rate the applicant has been paid is correct. No correction of military record is required. The complete DFAS-IN evaluation is at Exhibit B. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 7 July 2015 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case. While we note DFAS-IN’s recommendation to approve the case, they also note the applicant has been paid the correct amount of BAH for the period in question based on her military status. Accordingly, we find the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00662 in Executive Session on 22 September 2015 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Memorandum, DFAS-IN, dated 7 May 15. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jul 15.