RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS. IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-00663 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) Type I from 9 Jun 14 through 11 Jul 14. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was paid BAH type II for Non-contingency and Annual Training Orders for that time period and it should be the higher rate. He provides copies of his orders and references to the Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) pertaining to Reserve Component Housing Allowances in support of his application. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 17 Jul 07, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. On 16 Jul 13, the applicant was released from active duty after completion of required active service and transferred to the Air National Guard. He was credited with 6 years of active service. On 17 Jul 13, Special Order P-74 enlisted the applicant in the XXXX Air National Guard (ANG). On 5 Jun 14, the applicant was ordered to active duty in accordance with (IAW) Title 10, USC 12301 (D), Non-contingency MPA Tour in support of AEF, Order Number Z66T3J, from 9 – 30 Jun 14. On 7 Jun 14, the applicant was ordered to active duty IAW Title 32, USC 502 (A), Annual Training, Order Number Z66X55, from 1 – 11 Jul 14. On 11 Jul 14, the applicant was ordered to active duty IAW Title 10 USC 12301 (D), In Support of a Contingency, Order Number Z68SBX, from 12 Jul 14 through 25 Feb 15. According to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with the applicant’s release from active duty due to demobilization, he was called to active duty in support of OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM from 12 Jul 14 to 23 Jul 15. The applicant is currently serving in the ANG. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-IN recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While the applicant has multiple sets of Orders, they are not continuous. He started each tour from his home and ended each tour at his home. The first order was designed to prepare him for deployment. The second order was his annual training tour required to maintain skills and ensure a “good year” for retirement purposes. These two orders qualified the applicant for BAH-RC under JFTR, Chapter 10, Part E, Section 13, paragraph U10014. His third order was a contingency tour qualifying him for BAH under the JFTR, Chapter 10, Part E, Section 13, paragraph U10428. Based on the JFTR rules, the applicant was paid correctly. The complete DFAS-IN evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 May 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission, including attachments, in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force OPR and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. We note the applicant was not on one continuous set of orders during the time period he is requesting relief, but was on three different sets of orders, one of which qualified him for the higher BAH rate. While we acknowledge the applicant’s request to change the type of BAH he received, we believe he has not demonstrated evidence of an injustice or error, as compared to others in his similar situation. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00663 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Aug 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, DFAS-IN, dated 7 May 15. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 May 15.