ECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS. IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-00683 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her military records be corrected to show Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) to her daughter. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was not notified of the information that she could transfer the Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to her dependent. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 28 Jun 01, the applicant entered the Missouri Air National Guard. On 27 Jun 07, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, and was credited with 6 years of active service. On 1 Aug 09, service members became eligible to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to their dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The Post 9/11 GI Bill became effective 1 Aug 2009 based on the Post 9/11 Veteran Education Assistance Act of 2008, as a result Public Law No. 110-252 signed by the President on 30 June 2008. Transfer of Education Benefits to dependents was included as part of the law. Public Law No. 110-252. Section 3319(f)(1) states in part, that “an individual approved to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed.” Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003 – Post9/11 GI Bill, 22 Jun 2009, (reissued 14 Sep 2011) attachment 2, paragraph 3.g.1 states. “Time for Transfer. An Individual approved to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section may transfer such entitlement to the individual’s family member only while serving in the Armed Forces.” Both of these documents were published on government-hosted websites prior to the effective date of the Post 9/11 GI Bill. The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), the DoD and the Military Services Widely publicized the Post 9/11 GI Bill and the transferability feature. The DoD developed a special website, hosted by the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), to facilitate the transfer of educational benefits. The website became operational n 27 Jun 2009 for the purpose of accepting transfer of benefits applications. The Air National Guard implemented a communication plan, utilizing the Recruiting and Retention Manages (RRMs), to serve as a liaisons between NGB,DMDC,DVA, and the 54 states/territories. The RRM is required to give Post 9/11 GI Bill and Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) program briefings, as well as, advertising the programs via internal media and communication tools (Facebook, print-ads and Newsletters). SrA Hill separated on 27 Jun 2007, prior to the conception of the Post 9/11 GI Bill. A complete copy of the NGB/A1Y evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 12 Nov 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00683 in Executive Session on 28 Jan 16 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00683 was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Jan 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, NGB/A1Y, dated 20 Oct 15. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Nov 15.