RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-00737 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect his complete service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The period of time he served in Undergraduate Pilot Training, as a Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Counselor, and his Reserve service is not properly reflected on his DD Form 214. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Air Force Reserve on 11 Dec 81. On 26 Jan 82, the applicant entered active duty in the grade of Staff Sergeant to attend the Air Force Officer Basic Military Training Precommissioning Course. On 24 May 82, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, with a narrative reason for separation of “To accept commission in the Air Force from Officer Training Program,” and was credited with 3 months and 19 days of net active service. On 25 May 82, the applicant entered active duty in the grade of second lieutenant to attend Undergraduate Flying Training. On 6 Jun 83, the applicant was eliminated from flying training due to flying deficiency. On 4 Jul 83, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, with a narrative reason for separation of “Involuntary Release: Failure to complete Flying or Technical School,” and was credited with one year, five months and eight days of total active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant’s DD Form 214 covering the period 26 Jan 82 through 24 May 82 indicates he was discharged after the Officer Basic Military Training Precommissioning Course to accept a commission and begin pilot training. His subsequent DD Form 214 for the period 25 May 82 to 4 Jul 83 reflects his time spent in Pilot Training and Officer Training School, and his involuntary release for failure to complete flying. Upon his release, he was transferred to the Obligated Reserve Section effective 4 Jul 83 and later to the Nonaffiliated Reserve Section. While he was assigned to these Reserve Sections, he did not participate but received membership points only. On 28 Jul 89, the applicant submitted his letter of resignation, stating he was not interested in serving as a Reservist. On 4 Aug 89, he was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve. There was no indication in his record of his service as a Drug and Rehabilitation Counselor. His separation forms were properly issued in accordance with AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Feb 16 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a careful review of the applicant's contentions, documentation submitted in support of the request, and the available evidence of record, we are not convinced the applicant has provided sufficient evidence for us to conclude that he/she is the victim of an error or injustice. We also note the applicant did not file the application within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered, or should have been discovered, as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603. While the applicant claims a date of discovery of less than three years prior to receipt of the application, we believe a reasonable date of discovery was more than three years prior to receipt of the application. Therefore, because we do not find it would be in the interest of justice to recommend granting relief, and the applicant has offered no plausible reason for the delay in filing the application, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file the application. Accordingly, we find the application untimely. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00737 in Executive Session on 24 Mar 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Feb 15. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPTS, dated 21 Jan 16. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Feb 16.