RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-01024 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement – United States Air Force, be corrected to reflect he elected participation in the Enlisted College Loan Program (CLRP). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His AF Form 3008 signed on 18 March 2013 does not contain his initials indicating that he waived his CLRP enrollment option. It appears as if the form was not scanned properly into the Personnel Records Display Application (PRDA) because the beginning of the statement and the end of the sentence can be seen on the form. He went to the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) on 29 July 2013 and provided his recruiter all his promissory notes for his loans and made a corrected copy of his AF Form 2008 since the first one did not include the following statement: “I have been briefed on the College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP) and either do not meet the program requirements, or elect not to participate. I understand my initial enlistment is the only opportunity to enroll in the CLRP and I permanently waive my CLRP enrollment option ( ).” He did not waive his CLRP enrollment option when he enlisted on 29 July 2013. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman first class (E-3). On 30 July 2013, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. According to his AF Form 3008, dated 29 July 2013, it does not contain a statement acknowledging non-participation in the CLRP nor does it have a statement acknowledging participation in the CLRP. Pursuant to Title 10 USC § 2171, the ECLRP is offered only at enlistment to first term airmen and must be used within the first term of service. The program is time sensitive and upon entering a second term of enlistment, participation into the program is negated under current Air Force policy. The Air Force repays the lesser amount of one-third of $3,333.33, per year of outstanding qualifying student loans. Payments are made in three annual installments and the maximum amount is $10,000.00 less federal income tax. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. There is no proof of an error or injustice on the part of the Air Force. Additionally, there is no corrected AF Form 3008 in the member’s personnel record. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 September 2015 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that relief is warranted. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The applicant contends he accomplished a corrected copy of his AF Form 3008; however, he has not provided sufficient evidence to show a corrected AF Form 3008 was placed into his records. Furthermore, other than his own uncorroborated assertion, he has provided no corroborative evidence to support he meets the criteria for enrollment in the CLRP. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01024 in Executive Session on 15 October 2015 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 March 2015, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, 24 August 2015. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 September 2015.