RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-01083 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to his new address. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He no longer lives in Minnesota. His new address is in Georgia. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 26 May 09, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. His Enlistment Document (DD Form 4) dated 26 May 09, Item 3 lists [Minnesota] as his HOR. On 25 May 15 the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with 6 years, of active service. Item 7b. of the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, lists, Home of Record at Time of Entry as [Minnesota]. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has no relevant proof that his HOR should be changed to reflect an accurate address at the time of enlistment. The DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, is the source document for Home of Record (HOR). The Joint Federal Travel Regulation states “The place recorded as the home of the individual when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commissioned, appointed, enlisted or inducted, or ordered into the tour of active duty, unless there is a break in service of more than one full day. Only if a break in service exceeds one full day, may the member change the HOR.” The HOR is the location identified by the individual upon entering the service, not a location where the individual is later assigned or a location selected for convenience; a correction must be fully justified. Domicile or legal residence may change, but the HOR will not. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 Nov 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01083 in Executive Session on 15 Dec 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence pertaining was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Mar 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIE, dated 2 Nov 15. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Nov 15.