RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-01149 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 2X (first-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program [SRP]) be changed to an RE code allowing reenlistment in the military. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His RE code 2X does not reflect his service in the Air Force, and it is hindering his reentry into the military. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 6 Sep 11. On 27 Feb 13, the applicant was given a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for making a False Official Statement. On 6 Mar 13, the applicant’s commander established an Unfavorable Information File on him, and placed him on a Control Roster. On 19 Mar 13, the applicant’s commander non-selected him for reenlistment on AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration For Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve. On 31 May 13, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with 1 year, 8 months, and 25 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR-SEP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant was separated from the Air Force 31 May 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, with an honorable discharge. His military personnel record shows that on 19 Mar 13, the applicant’s commander signed an Air Force Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating that he was not recommending the applicant for reenlistment/further retention in the Air Force. The applicant had been given a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 28 Feb 13 and he had also been given an Unfavorable Information File (UIF) and placed on the Control Roster. In addition, the applicant had been disqualified from his previous career field and was pending retraining into the Contracting Apprentice career field when he received the UIF and was placed on the Control Roster. Those derogatory actions eliminated him from all potential retraining options and left him with no Air Force specialty. The only remaining option for his commander was to separate the applicant under the FY13 AF Force Shaping Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant was separated under the FY13 AF Force Shaping Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program on 31 May 13, after serving 1 year, 8 months, and 25 days of service with an honorable character of service. On 19 Mar 13, applicant’s commander non-selected him for reenlistment on an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration. The AF Form 418 references a LOR, placed on the Control Roster, and a UIF. The applicant acknowledged non-selection 19 Mar 13 and rendered his intent not to appeal the decision on 25 Mar 13. He received the RE code 2X based on being denied reenlistment. AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. The SRP considers the member’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable Information from any substantiated source, the airman’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the airman’s ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty performance levels. It is clear the applicant’s commander had justification for denial of reenlistment. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 7 Jul 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. 4.  The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01149 in Executive Session on 7 Oct 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01149 was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Mar 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR-SEP, dated 6 Apr 15. Exhibit D.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 27 Apr 15. Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jul 15.