RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-01192 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive pay, points, and benefits for one additional day of mobilization under Partial Mobilization Order Number Z5V7TE, dated 16 Dec 14, covering the period 15 Apr 14 through 13 Dec 14 in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to transportation delays in theater, he did not return to his home station on the date he was scheduled. He arrived home on 9 Nov 14, and should have had his orders extended by one additional day to allow him to take the additional day of leave he earned. The Manpower MPA Man-day Management System was never updated to credit him with the additional day of service. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served on active duty in the Alabama Air National Guard during the matter under review. Under Partial Mobilization Order Number Z5V7PA, dated 16 Dec 14, the applicant was mobilized in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM during the period 15 Apr 14 through 13 Dec 14. According to the documentation provided by the applicant he arrived back home after his Operation ENDURING FREEDOM deployment on 10 Nov 14. In accordance with the Air Combat Command (ACC) Post-Deployment Downtime (PDSDT) Guidance Memorandum, dated 12 Apr 11, for deployments over 90 days, commanders may provide four compensatory days and not more than 10 days of unscheduled time to tend to personal and professional matters (14 days total) deferred while deployed, and the post-deployment downtime will start as soon as possible following return to home station, not to exceed 72 hours after return. On 13 Dec 14, the applicant was issued a honorable discharge, with a narrative reason for separation of “release due to demobilization,” and was credited with 7 months and 29 days of net active service this period. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. According to the ACC PDSDT Memorandum, dated 12 Apr 11, the applicant was entitled to 14 days of PDSDT immediately following his return from deployment in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. According to the member-filed travel voucher, the member arrived back at his residence from deployment on 10 Nov 14. The member’s PDSDT began on 11 Nov 14 and ended on 24 Nov 14. In accordance with the leave accrual procedures in AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, the applicant accrued 18 days of leave during his active duty deployment. His leave period began on 25 Nov 14 and ended on 12 Dec 14. Analysis shows the applicant’s order end date of 13 Dec 14 allowed the applicant to use all 14 days of PDSDT and all 18 days of leave accrued. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Feb 16 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of NGB/A1PR and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In this respect, the applicant was afforded the opportunity to exhaust both his accrued leave and PDSDT prior to the completion date of his active duty tour thereby negating the need to extend his mobilization order. As such, the applicant was credited with the appropriate pay, points, and benefits he earned during this period of active duty service. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01192 in Executive Session on 21 Apr 16 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Mar 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, NGB/A1PR, dated 9 Feb 16, w/atchs. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Feb 16.