RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS. IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-01604 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His WD AGO, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation—Honorable Discharge, is updated with his Army Air Corps service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The missing information went unnoticed until he applied for medical assistance from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 28 Nov 45, the applicant entered the Army of the United States (Air Corps). On 13 Dec 46, the applicant received an honorable discharge and was credited with 1 year and 16 days of active service. His prior service credit is recorded as 1 year, 9 months and 14 days. He was credited with 2 years, 10 months and 11 days for pay purposes. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating the WD AGO reflects the total time served in active service. A review of his military records did not identify a WD AGO for the earlier period(s) of service (service dates and characterization unknown); nor are there sufficient records available to reconstruct one. Further evidence of prior service is visible in block 45, “Longevity for Pay Purposes” that records 02 years, 10 months and 11 days. It is the expert opinion of this office and from the number of cases reviewed annually, that the individual from the DVA that identified that perceived error may be unfamiliar with the varied versions/format, rules, directives or policies that govern the separation discharge certificates for the differing time periods. DPSOR did not find an error in the processing of the 1946 WD AGO and recognizes that it does not reflect his prior service. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 Oct 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed. While the applicant claims a date of discovery of less than three years ago, in our view, the reasonable date of discovery of the alleged error or injustice was more than three years ago and the application is therefore untimely, however; it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01604 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Apr 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 20 Oct 15. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Oct 15.