RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS. IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-01680 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dependents be entitled to his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he retired in 2005 he was not informed he needed to transfer his Post 9/11 educational benefits to his dependents while still on active duty. During the timeframe (2005) when he retired from the USAF it was never addressed in the Transition Assistance Program or was it even an option to appoint a dependent to receive this entitlement. He received his Certificate of Eligibility from the VA at the 100% rate on 7 Apr 15 and at that time he was informed. He needs to make his sons eligible for this educational benefit. He has no supporting documentation other than it was not an option to designate a dependent back in 2005. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 1 Oct 79 the applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force. On 31 Oct 05, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with 26 years and one month of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant contends that he served on Active Duty until 31 Oct 05 and should be allowed to transfer benefits to dependents. By law and DoD Instruction service members must serve on or after 1 Aug 09 to be eligible to transfer benefits. The program for the Transfer of Benefits started 1 Aug 09. The member retired effective 1 Nov 05. Therefore the applicant is ineligible to transfer educational benefits to his dependents. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant refutes the AFPC/DPSIT advisory saying he earned this benefit having served 3 years past 9/11. He should be entitled to transfer this benefit even though it is not in-line with the Transfer of Educational Benefits program effective 1 Aug 09. (Exhibit D). THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission, to include the applicant’s rebuttal, in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPSIT and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01680 in Executive Session on 28 Jan 16 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Apr 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 5 May 15. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 23 Sep 15 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Sep 15