RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-01980 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His DD Form 214, Armed Force of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued 20 Sep 70, be updated with the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). Administratively corrected 2. His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, issued 1 Jul 74, be updated in block 19, to read “Yes.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to errors and omissions on his DD Forms 214, he has been classified into priority group 8G with the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Medical Center rather than group 6 for Vietnam Veterans. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 21 Sep 66, the applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force. The DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 20 Sep 70 discharge, documents three months and four days of foreign and/or sea service. The DD Form 214, Report of Separation From Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 1 Jul 74 discharge, documents the applicant’s foreign and/or sea service as zero for the inclusive period 21 Sep 70 thru 1 Jul 74 and block 19, Indochina or Korea service since August 5, 1964, is checked “NO.” According to AF Form 1712, Uniform Military Personnel Record, supplied by the applicant, Section 5, Combat Record reads “Viet Air PH III”; Section 7, Awards reads “VSM”; and Section 8 Foreign-Service-Tours reads “2 July 1968 to 3 October 1968 TDY Adjust.” On 1 Jul 74, the applicant received an honorable discharge and was credited with 7 years, 10 months, and 11 days of active service. On 7 Dec 15, DP1SP recommended the applicant’s official military personnel record be administratively corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/2BSSs) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request for service credit in the Republic of Vietnam because the information provided and master personnel records did not contain information that reflects he served in Vietnam. While the applicant’s AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, reflects a Temporary Duty (TDY) assignment to Southeast Asia from 2 Jul 68 to 3 Oct 68, DPAPP was unable to determine the exact location of the TDY. A complete copy of the DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DP1SP indicates no action is required. Based on the applicant’s official military personnel record, they were able to determine the applicant’s record should have been awarded the VSM w/2BSSs and the RVNGC w/P during his service. DP1SP noted administrative correction of the applicant’s official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DP2STM. A complete copy of the AFPC/DP1SP evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 16 Dec 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The applicant was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting correction of the applicant’s records with respect to annotating foreign and/or sea service on his DD Form 214 issued in conjunction with his 1 Jul 74 discharge. A review of the applicant’s military records revealed two DD Forms 214; each carrying its own weight as a record for a specific period of active duty. As such, his foreign and/or sea service is appropriately recorded on each DD Form 214. We note AFPC/DP1SP has determined the applicant’s eligibility for the VSM w/2BSS and the RVNGC w/P and will correct his records administratively. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting relief beyond that rendered administratively. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01980 in Executive Session on 12 April 2016 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 May 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 27 Oct 15. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DP3SP, dated 7 Dec 15. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 15. 3