RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2016-00191 COUNSEL:	NONE
HEARING DESIRED:	NO

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reserve time is not shown on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His DD Form 214 was issued prior to his Reserve time.
The	applicant’s	complete	submission,	with	attachments,	is	at Exhibit A.

STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 10 Sep 02, the applicant initially entered active duty in the Regular Air Force.

On 1 Jul 08, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with 5 years, 9 months, and 22 days of active service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPST recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice requiring the correction of his DD Form 214. After reviewing the member’s points, there were no periods of active duty that were 90 days or more. While the member’s term of service included six years in the Air Force Reserve, there are no documents identifying that the member meets the criteria to amend his current, or receive an additional DD Form 214. Per AFI 36- 3202, paragraph 4.5, to receive a DD Form 214 a member must complete 90 or more consecutive active duty days or 1 day or more if in support of a contingency operation. Furthermore, the member

does not provide evidence to reflect an error in his military record.

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPST evaluation is at Exhibit C.

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Jul 16 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.
3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. There was no evidence found or provided that indicates the applicant’s current DD Form
214 is in error, or that he served the necessary 90 or more consecutive active duty days to receive another DD Form 214. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2016-00191 in Executive Session on 16 March 2017 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

Panel Chair Member
Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2016-00191 was considered:

Exhibit A.	DD Form 149, dated 14 Jan 16, w/atchs. Exhibit B.	Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.	Memorandum, ARPC/DPTS, dated 25 May 16. Exhibit D.	Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jul 16.

Pursuant to paragraph 1 of AFI 36-2603 (Title 32 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 865.1), it is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

5/4/

3