PERSONAL APPEARANCE
,...-;N-;-A;-ME°O""F""r°oiJNsEL AND OR ORGANIZATIQN

X   RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS ANO OR ORGl\Nl:!'.ATION OF COUNSEL

MEMBERS SITilNG

'I;.

..

x x x
i x
x

1	ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

2	APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

}!EARING llATE
30 MAY 02

CASE NUMBER
FD2002-0024

3	LETTER Of NOTIFICATION
4		BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADOlTIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL  APPEARANCE

TAPE Rf\CORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Boa rd, the right to a personal appearancewithJwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR	.

SAPIMJBR
550 C STREET WEST, S1JIT1:40 RANOOLPll AFB. TX 78150-4742

AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN  00

(EF-V2)

SECRt:TARY OF THE AIR FORCF PFRSONN FLCOU NCll , A1R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
Previous edition will be used.

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

I	

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but  to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leadingto the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and  a thorough review of the record, the Board was able to identify none that would  a change of discharge.

ISSUE:  The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge.  The records indicated applicant had  received a Letter of Reprimand for Adultery and found guilty by a Summary Court Martial for Adultery.
The Board concluded the disciplinary infractions were a significant departure	the conduct expected of all military members. The Board found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided  administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board  concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief