AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

t-2_1_11_• ·1_111__1___•	------+==-

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRADE

TYPE

i! I

PERSONAL APPEARANCE

X    RECORDREVIEW

YE.	NO
x

NAME OF COUNEL Af;D OR ORGANl7.AT!ON

--·--·-·---------·	ADDIU.'SS AND OR ORGANlt.ATION OFCOL'NSEL

x x x x

2	APPLJCA TION FOR REVIEW 0F DISCHARGE

I !EARING DATE
29 May 02

c:ASE'Nifilii'EF.
FD2002-0025
3	
J.F.TTF.R OFNOTIFICATION
4	RRlF.F OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASETOTH F. ROA RD-
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL  APPEARANCE

RF\.1ARKS
Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of t he Board, the right to a personal  appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR

SAFIM!BR
550C STR EET WEST. SU ITE 40

RANDOLPf l Al'U, TX 78150-4742

(EF-V2)

SECR ETA RY OF Tl IE AIR FORCE PERSON NEL COUNCIL AI R FORCE DISCl l ARGE REVlEW BOAR D
l 535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3ID FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MU 20762-7002
Previous edition will be used.

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	NUMBER	

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for a Change	Reason and Authority for Discharge

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise this right
-	-	I-	--	
The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors	to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Change in Reason and Authority for Discharge is denied.

The board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety, which would justify a change of reason and authority for discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant was honorable discharged but wants his narrative reason for separation changed to erroneous enlistment so that he can go back into the military. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base a change in reason and authority for discharge. The records indicated the applicant fraudulently signed AF Form 2030, USAF Drug and Alcohol Abuse Certificate, DD Form 1966, Record of Military Processing, and 86, Questionnaire for National Security Positions, stating he had not used marijuana or any other	drugs. Applicant submitted a statement attesting to the fact that he used marijuana, ecstasy and a mixture of over the counter drugs (amphetamines) between 1996 and 1998. The Board concluded that the characterization, reason and authority of the applicant's discharge were appropriate due to the fraudulent entries on		documents.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided	administrative due process,

In view of the foregoing findings the board	concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for change in reason and authority for discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief