PERSONAL APPEARANCE	
X  RECORD REVIEW	
NAME OF COUNSEL A.'.oll OR ORG.l\NIZATION	ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL	

x x x

HEARING DATE
12JUN 02

...

'i)'iUMBtR
U02-0078

1	ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2	APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF D!SCHAR_GE
3	LETTER OFNOTIFICATION
4	BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S ll.ELfu\SE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT Tl1v!E OF PERSONAL.".PPEARA.o'iCE

REMARKS
Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel. and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR

-..-

SAF/MIBR
550 C STREET WEST. SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB. TX 78150-4712

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL

J

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR. EE WJNG. 3RD FLOOR

··--- ·-----------------'------A-JN_·o__REw_s_A FB_._,._m_2=0__621·_0_02_...,..,...,..--.,-,-,-----,,-----
AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00	(EF-V2)	Previous edition wilt.be used.

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW’ BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	I
GENERAL  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the reason and authority for discharge

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board	but declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the	to the discharge
FINDINGS:	of discharge is denied

.-

The board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety, which	a change of discharge	- -
ISSUE.  Applicant does not contest his discharge	He states that he has served his country for over 10 years honorable. with the exception of the events that surrounded his			he alludes to all his post service activities	The record indicates that the applicant received an Article for	carrying a        concealed weapon and for being disorderly	He also received four Letters of Reprimand (LOR) for fighting, taking a female, not his wife, into bed in unaccompanied quarters, failure to provide accurate contact information on a recall roster, and failure to pay just debts	An Administrative Discharge Board found the applicant guilty on the Article	charge and the first LOR, fighting  He was found Not Guilty on the other three		The	took note of the applicant’s duty performance as documented performance reports, and other information contained in the records		They found the seriousness
willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant’s duty performance	The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons that were the basis for this case  The		was
that the applicant was doing well and has a good job  However. no inequity or impropriety in his
was found in the course of the hearing  The Board concluded the misconduct of the	appropriately characterized his term of service

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the	consistent	the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was		discretion of the discharge authority	the applicant was provided	administrative
F-
In view of the foregoing-findings the board	concludes that there exists no legal or equitable upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant’s discharge should not be changed

Attachment: Examiner’sBrief