Au7.IO

.llf'.AR!lll'b DATE
27 AUG 02

CA$1t'. NIJMEER	4
11»2002-0142
···

B-Rii,,f OF PERS·{	·i i:1.,
COlJNSEL'S iii:LEASE nh'1m DOl\RI)
M"JDJT!t)NAL EXHIBIT; SUBJJTrn- D-AT Tll\-1H of
!'Efi;<;ONAL APPEARANCE

Case heard at Washington, .l>.C.
Advise applicant or the decision of tbe Board, tht right to a personal a11pearance, and the right to submit an application to
the Af/BCMR

L.

SAl'/MllJR
5l0 C STllf'ET WEST, Sl ;nc; 411     	

SECRETMY l>F THE  IR FOR<» PERSON'iEL('OllNC'!L
A.JR FOHCE OISCf"JA!HJE REVIEV..1 BOARD
15J5 C()l\-1i\.Li\NT) DR. !!E \VlNU, 3KL' FI,()Of.:.

RANDOLPH AFD, TX 78150.-,4,7._42_	,

AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00

I

(	)

---·'
EF-V2

A'IDRFWS AFD. MD 20762-7002
Previous edition wili be used.

AIR FORCF: DISCHARGE RF.VIEW BOARD 01.l;CISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE Nl:).'fFER

FDO l -0142	

GENER&.L: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) bul declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinen t data on the applicant and the factors lead ing lo t he discharge,

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discha rge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was able to identify none that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated applicant had
received two Article 15's for using his government credit card for unofficial purposes and wrnngfolly using his government computer to process pornography.  Also, the applicant recei ved a Vacation action on her reduction to Airman for using his government credit card for unofficial purposes	He also received two Letters of Counseling for failure to go, lying, missing a medical appointment and unaut horized use of a
computer. The Board concluded the di scipl inary infractions were a signi ficant depa11u rc from the conducl expected of all military members. The Board found no evidence of impropriety or i nequily i n t his case on which to base an upgrade of d ischarge.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consi stent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within t he discret ion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board fu11her concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief