AIR FORCE DISCHARGE  REVIEW BOARD HEARING  RECORD

Pl':RSONAL APPEARANCI!:
;\l\1t UV l"Olli"llit'.L A. I} OK 1}t.:t;ANl1A T1fJN•-M••

x RECORD REv rnw

MEMBERS SITTING

-----------+----!,----·--····

OTirF.R	DE!iY
x
x
x x x

A67.to

1	ORDER APl'OlNTr.;Q THE HOAlm
2	APPl.!CATJON FOR REVIEW OF Df8Cl(\1WE ..
...._. L .I LETTER OF NOTif iCATION

,_.,., l,!.ARIN=c oAT E--------1- c=ASE=!"=liM=n=c,. ---------	4 : BRIEF ()F PERSONNEL f'lLE

1

3 OCT 02	FD2002-0198	COUNSEL'S Rtff \sE- T-_( _T_HE=l-l0AR=D ---
;...._ ··'XDn:i noNAL EXHIBITS "'t:B!'.rfff::J:"J> 11·r r1i:.:1·1;:·0F
PERSO>l•.\1A:	Ai\'.A't\°\;E

RJ!MARK!J
Cll$C heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal a1r1>earancc with/without cmmsel, and the right to
submit rut a1lplication to the AFBCMR

·---

Al'iMIDR
50 C STREET WEST. BLUTE 40
RANOOLl'll AFB, TX 78150-4742

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-V2}

SECRETARY OJ' nm AIR FORCE PERSONNli1' COUNCIL
AJR rllHl'> DlSC!IARQE REVIEW BOARD
_l 5'.15 l..\.)l\.1.t>.1A.t'ID DR, EI. WING, 3fl-° FL()( )R ANDREWS  AFB. MD 20762-7002
Previous.edition wilt be used.

AIR FORCE DISCHA RGE R F.VI F.W BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONA LE	CASE NllDER

FD02-0198	

GEN ER..\L:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was oflered a personal appearance before t he Discharge Review Board (DRll) but declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the avai l able pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge

FTNDTNGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge,
and after a thorough review of t he record, the Board was able lo identify none that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSI:E: The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of im propriety or inequity in this case on which 10 base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated applicant had four Letters of Reprimand for failure to pay a traffic fine, failure to go and failure to pay just debt (t'A·iee). He also received four Letters of Counseling and a Memo f or Record for unsatisfactory off duty conduct, dishonored checks (twice), dereliction of duty and failure to go. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ampl e opportunit ies to change his negative/repet itive behavi or.
The Board concluded the disciplinary infractions were a significant departure from the conduct expected of all mi l itary members. The Board found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS:  The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion orthe discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

I n view of the foregoing findings the board farther concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus !he applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief