AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)	GRADE	AFSN/SSAN

SRA

x

TYPE UOTH
I

PERSONAL APPEARANCE

I	RECORD    REVIEW

COUNSEL	NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZA TJON	ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION  OF COUNSEL YES	No

VOTE OF THE BOAJU>
MEMBER  SITTING	HON	GEN	UOTHC	OTHER	DENY
x
µ
x
f-<	..
x
h
x
x
SSUES	A94.53	INDEX NUMBER	A67.30	·.•..·  EXi,IIB!TS·SUBMITJ;,ElFf,0)'.)IE   DOAlU.l:  .
A95.00	I	ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2	APPLICATION  FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3	LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4	BRJEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL  APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

HEARING DATE	CASE NUMBER

20 Oct 2004	FD-2003-00497
APPLICANT'S ISSUE fND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIO)'!AL ARE DIS.C::JJSl)ED (}	AT'fACD AIR FO.RCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
Case heard at Andrews AFB, MD, via video teleconference from Travis AFB, CA.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

··················------- .........- --------------------------.1. ...............-1•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
''	''
'	'
''	''

'	'

'	'
-1. •••••••••••• •.·••• ···· - --	'

"	INDORSEMEl'U'..
TO:	FROM:

DATE: ·10/2612004

SAF/MRBR	SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE  REVIEW BOARD

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

-

RANDOLPH  AFB, TX 781 50-4742	ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-V2)	Previous edition will be used

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL  RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2003-00497	

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant appeared before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) at Andrews AFB, MD, via video teleconference from Travis AFB, CA.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge and change of reenlistment code are denied.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief