,- <	AIR FORCE DISCHARGE  REVIEW  BOARD HEARING  RECORD

- j' NAME 9-,F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
,. .._._,.,

GRADE	AFSN/SSAN
AMN	7 7 J IUt

TYPE GEN	I	PERSONAL  APPEARANCE	x	I	RECORD  REVIEW

1---co. UNSE_L----1 NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION YES	No
x

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION  OF COUNSEL

.	VOTE OF THE BOARD

f-"

f-.

-,.

MEMBER SITTING

HON

GEN

UOTHC

OTHER

DENY

x x x x
x

ISSUES

A94.06

INDEX NUMBER	A67.10
A49.00

·..  ••...
'  .
l	ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

2	APPLICATION  FOR  REVIEW  OF DJSCHARGE
3	LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4		BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

HEARING DATE	CASE NUMBER

03 Jun 2004	FD-2004-00099
Al'PLICANT'S ISSUE AND J'l:I& BOARl)'S DECISJONALRATlONALARE DlSCU, SllpQl\I THEATTACHED AIR FORCE DSC!tOEREYIEW B.OARD DECISION,\L RATIOl'J',\LE

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR

,.-------------------------------------------------------------------------	-t.A_ _fl. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,r-------------
'	':

TO:	FROM:
SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78I 50-4742

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

....

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-V2)	Previous edition will be used

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL  RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2004-00099	

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of Discharge is denied.

ISSUE: Applicant does not contest his discharge. He merely states that he would like an upgrade so he can move on with his life. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, two Letters of Reprimand, and two AETC Forms 125A. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief