-
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD	·.
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)	GRADE	AFSN/SSAN
., a.a..  ,.,	.·JU  , .,   .
'	, ,,,	AlC
TYPE GEN	I	PERSONAL  APPEARANCE	x	I	RECORD  REVIEW
coll'NsE:t.	NAME OF COUNSEL ANO OR ORGANIZATION	ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION  OF COUNSEL YES	No
x

I

. .	VOTE OFTHE BOARD. .. : ;::;? .• .•.
MEMBER SITTING	HON	GEN	UOTHC	OTHER	DENY
-------------------------------------
,	x
--'
x
:.....
x
--	.
x
   ,
x
------------------------------------
ISSUES	A94.05	INDEX NUMBER	A62.00	EXHlITSSVBMI'n"ED TO mt BOARD
1	ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2	APPLICATION  FOR REVIEW  OF DISCHARGE
3	LETTER OF NOTJFICA TION
4	BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

HEARING DATE	CASE NUMBER

IO Dec 2004	FD-2004-00354
.  AP.PLICAN::$ s  .r'9lliBOARD:s DECISIONAL R1lfl'J4 A DJSCl)SSED <),N llE,AlTAClll!D A.IR FORCE OISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIOJ:iAL   ATJONALE .•• > . I •• < •.. ..
Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR

''         -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
''
'

''
-   -:-------- ----------------------------------------------	. ·: •,., .. , . ,	,,

-···---

>·).L\/'

.,	'·" .,	INDORSEMENT	:	: ))At.E: 12/liJ/2004
TO:	FROM:
SAF/MRBR	SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE JJISCHARGE  REVIEW  BOAR»
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40	1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RJ) FLOOR
RANDOLPH  AFB, TX 78150-4742	ANDREWS AFB, Mll 20762-7002

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-V2)	Previous edition will be used

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2004-00354	

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDINGS:   Upgrade of discharge is denied.
ISSUE: Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The records indicated the applicant received two Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Admonishment, and one Record of Individual Counseling for being late for duty and failure to go.  In addition, she knowingly made false representations in that she said that she had never experimented with, used, or possessed any illegal drug or narcotic when in fact, she had used LSD prior to her enlistment and failed to identify this at the time of her enlistment. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the. Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief