AIR FORCE DISCHARG E R EV IEW  BOA R D H EA RING  RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDULE INITIAL)	GRADE	AFSN/SSAN

-'     ---------------------------1 '

'':_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '.

--------------

AB	''	'.

':_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _'

TYPE GEN

I	PERSONAL APPEARA NCE	x	l	RECORD REVIEW

YES	I	No
I	x

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION	ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION  OF COUNSEL

>)	\/OTE OF THEIBOARD
I -···-·· ····'·'•--· •

MEMBER SITTING

HON	GEN

UOTHC

OTl lER	DENY

X+*

X-+ *

'
L-----------------------------------------

X+* X+*

ISSU :S

A94.53

INDEX NUMBER	A67.50
A67.90

1	ORDER APPOINTING THE HOARD
2	APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3	LETTER OF NOTI FICATION
4	BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILF COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THF HOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME or
PERSONAL  APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

···'-"-----------+-------------------+--+---------------------
Hl£ARING OATt:	CAS:NlJMBl£R

10 Ma r 2006	FD-2005-00177

•	D

Case heard at Washi ngton, D.C.

_ ,,,, ,	'   '

Ad vise appl icant of the deci sion of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an appl icat ion to the AFBCMR

Names and votes wil l be made available to the appl icant at the appl icant's req uest.

+ RE CODE
* REASON & AUTHORITY
$ G TF.: !l- P.ME;R _ _ _ _ _/,l _._ _ _ L_ _ _ _ /1. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _...._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Jl'!G!'_QJ:: !.19_R_D_!'.l!lf l!IJl'IJ_ _ -------. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
0
'
'
----------------------------------------------------------------,------------------------------------------------

==	-------='•'"'""'''''''''--···

lNDORSEMENT

DATE!  3/2712006

TO:

SAF/M RBR
550 C STREET WEST. SUI TE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742

. ...... ........	FROM;	-- ;RETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PF.R.S0NN-l:-L C..0LIN  1;:.
AIR FORCE OISCllARGE REVIEW IJOARD ISJS COMMAND DR. EE WING, lRll FLOOR

AN DREWS,_A_F_R,__11__o-,61_-100-2       ------------

1

A FHQ  FORM  0-2077, JAN  00	(EF-V2)	Previous ed ition wi l l be used

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2005-001 77	

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authori ty for the discharge, and to change the reenlist ment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Revi ew Board (ORB) but declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied.

The Board finds the applicant submitted  no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

The applicant submitted no issues and realized his actions while in the military were unacceptable and requested that the review be completed based on the available service record.  The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge.  The records indicated applicant had received two Article 15's, one for physically controlling a vehicle while drunk and the second Article 15 for failure to go at the time prescribed to appointed place of duty.  Applicant also received six Letters of Reprimand (failure to go; swapped post without authority; sleeping on duty; violation of doctor's orders; disobeying a lawful order; and violation of AETC Phase Program).  He also received a Letter of Counseling for sleeping on duty and a Letter of Admonishment for making a false official statement.  The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent wit h the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the appl icant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief