AlR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW HOARD HEARING RECOR D

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER  (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRADE

AFSN/SSAN

---+--	------·-----···,.---	 	 1--c·_u.,.N.. S__F:L__, NAME OF COll NSF:t A NO OR ORGANIZATION
YES	No
x

A MN
x	RECORD  REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION  OF COUNSFL

··--·, ·-.,·  --·-- ---------, --,- ----··--·-- ··-···--+---------
VOTE OF THE BOARDc
------------ -----···-

MEMBER SITTING

1----------

UOTHC	OTllER	DENY

·---- -  ---------------

------·	-----+-

HON---+-- GEN ---+----
x
x
x

x

   	x

ISSUES

A95.00

INDEX NUMBER

A67.10

EXHIBITS   SUBMITTED   TO·IBE-BOARD	,
I	ORDER APPOINTING THF BOAR D
2	APPLICATION FOR REVIEW or DISCHARGE

·---- ·-	----.. ---------!
3	LETTER or NOTI FICATION
---+--- ---------------- -·--
4	BRIEF or PERSONNEL FILE
----------------1
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXH IBITS SlJHMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL  APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDI NCi OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

HEARING DATE	CAW NUMBER

27 Dec 2005

FD-2005-00194

APPLICANrS ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE IJISCUSSEIJ ON 'IHh ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW HOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE

Case heard at Washi ngton, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR

Names and votes wi ll be made availabl e to the applicant at the appl icant's req uest.

TO:

SAF/MR BR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

lNDORS.EMENT

FRO Mo

DATE:  12/27/2005
.  . .. . . ················-·-···-    ------	 	

SECRETARY Of THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCii. AIR FORU: OISCllARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND OR, EE WING, JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762·7002

-----·-·    ---------------------'------------------·--------------

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-V2)

Previous edition will be used

A IR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE Nl)MBER
.
FB-2005-0ol 94	

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains avai l able pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The records indicated the applicant received two Arti cle 1Ss. One for writing bad checks, and the other for being AWOL, Failure to Go, making false official statements on various occasions and for falsel y signing an offici al record. The ORB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her negative behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the d ischarge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the d ischarge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the d i scharge regulation and was withi n the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing find ings the Board further concl udes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief