AIR FORCE DISCHARGE  REVIEW BOARD HEARING  RECORD
NAME OF SF.RVJrv Mvun..,n " • " ·- • ----· - ""'1T1AL)	GRADE	A J;ti;:l\J / ,t 'l\.T

!TYPE G EN

AMN
-
I	PERSONAL    APPEARANCE	x	I	RECORD    REVIEW

COUNSEL	NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION	ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION  OF COUNSEL YES	I	No
I x
·.  ::	VOJE ()FJ:Hlj: IJOARD
MEMBER  SITTING	HON	GEN	UOTHC	OTHER	DENY
x

t	I	I	I
l	x
-
ISSUES	A93.09	INDEX NUMBER	A67.IO	ExHIBi'I:SSUIJMIITED:fO THE BOARD
1	ORDER APPOINTTNG  THE BOARD
2	APPLICATION  FOR  REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3	LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4	BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL  APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDTNG  OF PERSONAL  APPEARANCE

HEARING DATE	CASE NUMBER

04 Jan 2006	FD-2005-00251	I
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON Tl!E ATTACHED AlRFORCE·l;llSCliARGEREVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
I
Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise appl icant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

	 			

·'	INDORSEMENT  ··	.. - -·- ,)	.	-·		
TO:	
SAF/MRBR
55.0 C STREET WEST; SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78I50-4742	FROM:		
		SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW  BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING. 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002		

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.

SIGNATURE OF Rirroonli'o

I	oF BOARD  PREsjitNT

I

:AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-V2)	Previous edition will be used

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2005-00251	

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authority for the discharge, and change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates  an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant does not contest his discharge. He states that he would like to reenter the military. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and a Vacation action under the UCMJ for failure to go on divers occasions. In addition, he received three Letters of Reprimand for being continuously late for work and was place on a Control Roster and received an Unfavorable Information File. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded the miscond uct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief