AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE ME	ER (	ST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRADE

A FSN/SSAN

MB

LA

--" "'"'

I    Y£SC?!N$E..

- •...,... .. ,

1

Al C

rUOT	i:ERfN

""'O•co""'''""OR o•G"""'"'	'°"' ''"'"0•°""   no• 0''0"""·

I-	TYPE GEN

--'---- P_ER__s__N_A L_A_P_P_E_A_R_A_Nc_E

-----+-x__,

RE_C_O_R_D_RE_v_rn_w	I

x
VOTE, pJi i'HE BOARD

MEMBER SITTING ----------+--1-10_N_--+---- ---Gru

x
x
x _--1

---.=-

ISS!J t:S	INDEX  NUMBER

-----+---.,,,-------EXlllB-=OO,-§-,---u---n- ·MIITEO-TO+--.-J-J-cE--B--O--A-   RD---	I

l1	-"'"R' D-E_R_A----'P P=o""1NTlNG-.'.---l-' lE·BO__A=RD=

==========·: 	

2	APPUCA TlON  FOR  KEVJEW  OF DISCHAH.GE	I
3	LETTER  OF NOTiflCATION
2	

COUNSEL'S RELLASE TO THE BOARD

_	-·=

4	BRIEF OF  PERSONNEL  FILE	I
ADDITIONAL EXI 1m1Ts stmMITTED AT TIME or	I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

Ht:ARING DA.n:

CASE NUMTIER

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
 	---- -----+---+----- -------- -	--·· ---

27 Dec 2005	FD-2005-00258
APPUC_ANT'S ISSUE AND l'HEB\);.µiD'S DECISIONALRAJ;! ONAL ARE [)!SCtlSSED,OliiFJ;I,I,E• " A' TT' ACHED A.l,·R:, F·' '.P,,,RCE DlSC···H··: i'J' ti'";<:J'•'E•' R.....EVIEW.:. BOAR'• D 'DEClSf•P'(::..N:·.·::A:,:,.,,l. RAT1\)N!i
Case heard at Wash ington, D.C.

Advise  appl i cant of the decision of the Board, the right to a persona l  appearance with/without  counsel , and the right to su bm it an appl ication to the AFBCMR

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.

,,-	-" <-·    ·

.......,..	..t \   '	;:::---

-- - -- - -    -

INDOR$Ji)'J'il.ENT      '  ,.  .	rn\:TE1...12/25'12oos

J

TO:	-    --'-'' ·	---"·'--	-·'-- --"· -'--,,,. ....  ,_ _ ,	· ·· ·   FRk ,-	JJi."'--- -	..L-·-··   ·	c,Ell!L-----'--.:tel '·"•·•·'"· "	··   ··	cc...c •••   --···-
S/\f/M}{8R	SECRETARY OF THE MR FORCE Pi:RSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR •·ORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW  BOA.RD
550 C STH.EET WEST, SUITE 40	1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
78150-4 742	. ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
RANDOLPIIAFB,  TX
---	---

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, .JAN 00	(EF-V2)

Previous edition will be used

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOAR D DECISIONAL RATl ONALE	CASE NllM BER
,.
FD-2005-002 8	

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contai ns avail able pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that  provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: Appl icant does not contest  his discharge. He states that he is now a better person and a hard worker.  The records indicated the appl icant recei ved three Article l Ss.  The first one for stealing and selling a box of aircraft warni ng streamers and an aircraft landing light. The second one for spouse abuse, and the third for wrongfully exposing himself In add ition he also received two Letters of Reprimand for failing his yard inspection three times and for dereliction of duty. The DRB opined that through these administrati ve actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge recei ved by the appl icant was found to be appropriate. The DR B was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has a good job. l lowever, no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the heari ng. The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriatel y characteri zed his term of service.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the appl icant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief