AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARlNG RECORD

NAME OJi SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE IN ITIAL)

L--------------------------------•

GRADE

AlC

AFSN/SSAN

r In\ G!EN

i	' R.• ·. NA '   :PP

. 0 0i  Ji: JEW

•	c..,o..o,1._ts. u_,._.,;....,,.,,.. !!i.-.l'il1i. l;lll! c i,::o.: , "illD. f1,	!'llit !I.   i "
'l'U	Ii•

ADDRt'.SS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

MEMBER SITTING

-·	f?lEt	O

V

OJ?£,O

lE B

A:RD

I---"..'---=---·---"'---"'---.-----"-..-:----..      -
,;cft.1	j	,l()fHC	cJJt::ll

.

------------------------------------.	I	.l	x
..

..J

------------------------------------ ·
S.IJ£"s	A_9_4_._05	_	..,..._.N_l)£'X_N_!JM_BIC.R -A-·67.10-	- -- ----+------E·x'""n-·""·'_1_T_S_S_W....J...M-LW·.ED_T,.1.1.:.:>.m...
A67.00	1	ORDER APPOIN'ffNG TllE ROARD

x
x x
IE-BO_A_R...O..	I

HEARING UATE	I Cll  t:   LIY l!ll.
14 Ma r 2006	
2	
APF'LIC!\T!ON FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3	LETTER or NOTIFICATION
4	BRIEF OF PERSONN [L FILE
COUNSEL 'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXH113ITS SlJI3Ml"l 11:,D A I t tMF Ot· PERSONAL APPEAR ANCE
TAPE RECORDIN G OF PERSONAL. APPEARANCE

I  l'LK'IAM" SJSS{ E AND·l1£.B011Jl.D.tSl.	kkTJAUSPUN1HE Al'Ml'.'Htt! . fl. l'<IJ.t'El btAf.(lt:JU:Vl\11Jl()AR'.()l:)ECISIO. •\L RA'IJ1QN1"'1.E
Case heard at Wash ington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR

	----------- -------------	--		-	

-------

-----------------------      ---------------------------------	-- --

1'11:

s.Ali   UUHI;
550 C STR EET WEST. SUITE 40 RAN DOLPH Afl3, TX 78150-4742

SF.CRETARY OF TUE AIR  FOHCf  PEl<SONN!CL COIJNCll.
AIR FORCE OlSCllARGE Rf.VIEW ROA RD 1535 COMMANO DR,f,f. WING, 3RU FLOOK ANDREWS AFB,MD 20762-7002

AFHQ FORM  0-2077, JAN  00	(EF-V2)	Previous edition wi l l be used

AlR FOR  I!: DISCHARGE RF.VIF.W BOARD Of.Cl JONAL RATIONALE.	
FD-l005-00333	

RAL: Th1: 41pplleant i.tflpe.als for upgrade: of discharge to honornble.

The applkant was offered a personal appearance bd'orc the Discharge Rc:...·1ew Bl.)ard ( IJR.B) l'IUI declined to
exercise this right.

The attaehed brief co:ntafris R\rail.able pertinen l cl"bi on the upplicant and th!! factors leading to Lhe di54;hnrgc Fl	DE  G' :	pgradc of dicJ:uuc is denied.
The Roarcl finch lha1 neither the e-\l idenee of record nor tl1at provided by ctie Rppl canr :!;Ubstantiates an incquily or imprupric-ty 1hat \\roud j u_<ill fy a change of discharge-.

1. . lJ :

Applacarn contends discharge was mcquiLablc because i• w t!10 harsh. TI1e r cords ind icatcd the applii;ant recei\'ed im Article 15 for unl wfully grnhbing an ili r.tnan •s shoul ders \\ith bis hands. He; also rcci;ived f'wu Leners of Reprimand; one for rnising phy ·icaJ lrafrLi.ng formadon and the other for being I arc for d.t:taU on
1  thr« separ.te occasions; o.nc l .e1tel' of AdmoJl islunenl for beiin,g late to c Iass on th1rcc SCJli'lliUe oi,;casions and
nine AETC' Form 34 l's (Inti;: for fo;nr	u .n, failure to shove. did not ha\.·c mandator f iccm::., late fcir Jetirirs.
(:2 ). failure 10 shave/meet standnrd s :.n.s-ecurit y 1vio l.tu1v11., an<l late lo class.}. The DRB opined that through
lhese admin•strativc actio11s., Lhi:' .;ippUc:.a.lll had a.ritple opJl'U'rtlllt•ities. lo c:ha.11,ge h•s m:ga:Livc: bc:hnvior. The Board condudcd the: miseond\•tl \•.ras	signiikanl de-punrue. f!r--om oonduct expected of al] miHEl'.T)' n\-e1nl>ers. The charncmeri7..ation nf the di.sch.arg reci:i,,·t:'d l>y the appllcat1it v,.-as found to be: appropriate.
CONCL   SIO   s	The Discharge Review  Board  concludes !.hat the discharge  was consistent with  th
I procedural ru1d substantive rc.q\1j rerncntl" of f lte cli!i.Churg rt:gulatiotl and was \:i..•ilhin the ciisi;retjon Of the
discharge rmthori&y and lhnL tru: pplican1 w provided. full administrative due proc ·s.

In view of the foregoing findin I.he Bon.rd lilrmer conelude!i: 1hat there exists no lea1 or cquimbk basts for
up.grade of discharge. thus Che apphcant's disctiarge should not be changed .

Al Lacb.ment;
E1.u11inc:r's Brrie f	

iaii

,
1

I

I