AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIE\V BOARD HEARING RECORD

.	.

1    '\.\\I E lW SER\ IU: :\U:l\IBER (LAST, HRST Ml()ULE INITIAL)	GRAUE
.------------------------------- .

.	.

AFS'\/SSA:\

i

,--------------------- ·	'i

·-------------------------------·

Al\'IN

..	..	i

TYPE GEN

I	PERSONAL    APPEARANCE

x	I	RECORD    REVIEW	-

1--c-_o LTN_·_s·EJ_._-I >; .\  1E OF COL''iSEL ,\';D OR ORl;AN!ZATIO"I

ADDRESS .\1']) OR OR(;A'OIZATIO'i OF LOL·'i,EL	I
I
!

I	X	!
r-- - -----------------------+-------\i'O_T_E_'O-l'-'H_E _B_O'A_RD	_	_  _ i

! :	x	I
I ,
h

II ,
I :
I  '

H

I '

i :
I :

I  '

r-:
'.:_-_:_-_:_-_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --

I

x

I

x	I

x

I	!
I	I
-------------f- ---+- ----+-- --f --- - ----------1'
I x	I

I l''l L'	A94.53	J>;DEX ';UlM..R

A67.IO

i
EXHIBITS SUBMITTW TU THE HUAIDl	i
1	ORDf·R  APPOIJ\T!Mi   1 1 11: HO:\RD	I
2	APPi  ICATIOJ\ FOR RLVll·\V 01· DIS< 11.\!Hil·	1
3	!.FITER 01 NOTIFICATIOr-.	I
>-4--+-B__R_IJ-l·--(Jl-'-l-'l:_R_SO__r-.r_-_, 1'_.l_f_lL__I'	!
>---+----------------·--------  -
COLINSFL·s  Rf'Lb\Sl·: TO . n11;  fl( JAR I)	'
1----+-,._\,-=n"1"r"1'"0'"1"\. /".",r.-r: x 11113==·s-su=1Hl\.1n·1=1-.1 1  ,.\-1-1=·1 \ 11. -11 1	_ ,
PERSOJ\ AL A PPFA R ,\r\CI·.
>-----+- ----------------	·----·-··-
TAPE RE('OROING 0I' Pl .RS(lNAl. ,\ l'l'I..\RA"-< I

'r-- ----------t-- ------------------+---+-- -------------------------·--..

j  m: llU'« IJ.\'J L
i
I  05 J un 2006	FD-2005-00409
.-\1'1'1.JO\N 1 ·s ISUEANll Till' B(M.RO· DFCIWJNA!,RATIONAL ARE DISCV ON111E /\1TA('l!ElJ AIR HJRcE D!SCUA!«lE REV!l:W UOMW DU.IS!llNAI  R,,'JlON.Lt·

Case hea rd at Washi ngton, D.C.

Advi:-.c appl ica nt of the decision of t he Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without cou nsel. and t he ri ght to
i suhm tt an applicat ion to the AFBCMR
i
i
i Names and voks \viii be made available to the applicant at the applicant"s request.

I
'

I
I,.'.!':.:)1 -ll- 1 f'!:......_::s;::_..--..'!":.	- ••••••••••••••• J  conpd!Jf g, PJN:":.!!.>!:=Y.':2.(••• Zl ......-- .......................

:

1,.:
[·-.:·:_·--=   ----------··:z·--··miioRsEMENT	CfiATE:	6

l To,	SAF·MRHR	.
l	'i'iO C STRlTT WEST. SLITF 40 It..\   DOI.Pl I .\Fil_ TX 7:\ 1.'>0-47..\:'

---------------- -	-------'------	---------------------	
A.FHQ FORJ\f 0-2077, JAl'i 00	(EF-V2)	Prcvious c<li tio n 1vill be use tl	

-

FRO, :

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NV\'IBER

FD-2005-00409	

GENERAL:	The  applicant  appeals  for  upgrade  of  discharge  to  honorable,  to  change  the   reason   and au thori t y for t he discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance  before  the Discharge  Review  Board  (DRB) bu t  decli ned  tu exercise this righ t.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors lead ing to t he discha rge.

FIN DI NGS:    Upgrade  of  discharge,  change  of  reason  and  authori ty  for  discharge,  and  change  of
reenlistmen t code are denied.

The  Board  finds  that  neither  the  evidence  of  record  nor  that  provided  by  the  applica nt  substa n t ia tes  an i neq u i ty or impropriet y that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:  Applican t received  a General discharge for Misconduct - Minor Discipli nary  Infractions

Appl icant contends that he would like to go back into the military and serve his cou n try again.  The records ind icated the applicant received two Article 15s and three Letters of Reprimand for miscond uct to i ncl ude
u nde rage drinki ng, dereliction of duty, sleeping on duty, failure to go, and failu re to pay just  debts.  The DR U opined t hat t hrough these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportu ni ties to change his
nega ti ve behavior.   The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departu re from cond uct expected of all mil it <ny members and the characterization of the discharge recei ved by the applica nt \Vas found 1u appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the  discharge  was  consistent  wi th  t he proced u ral  and  substantive  requirements  of  the  discharge  regulation  and  was  withi n  the  discretion  of  the d ischarge  authori ty and that the applicant was provided  full administrative due process.

I n v ie\.\' of the foregoi ng findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge, reason and authority for discharge, and ree nl istment code should not be changed.

At!achrnent:
Exami ner's Brief