AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NMH  OF SEln'ICE M EMHEI{( LAST, Fll{ST Ml ODLE INITIAL)	GRADE

AFSN/SSAN

.- -- --- ----- ----- ----- --- -:	AJ4	:··············:

·I	J- r-): ·:·-.-=-_.=L	I	I

---

I   =:..-..----=

-=-  - -  -P_E_R_SO__N_A_L_A_-,P-E'A_RA

NC__      --------;-x----,1--REC__O_R_D_R EV IE,'_W_.

COl'NSEI.	N.\ IE <W COl NSEL ANIJ OR OR<:ANIZATION	ADDKESS ANIJ OK OKG.\NIZATION OF l'<ll;l".SEL

-----·-

x
----··-

·- ......-------------------------i•···.··.········· -----,.,_v,.,-o- n:---· -------..--- ..-·----·---

OF THEROARD

..  ----i------'-..   ··-      --     ,--'--:... ....:.....,, _ __

MEMHER SITTING

llON

(il·N	lJOT\ W	OTlll·R

1 >1-. N 'r

'·-·;;;;;:-·.;,··;;,····-- - ---- -------- .-;-;-;-.;-;'";."""':;"",:- ·_..,_,._.,._.-=--"-"-""-c-=-=---""-'"-"c-=-.=c:-;:c.=-=---=-c-:-;-;c.=-=-- ------------+-----+-----+------+----
x
-----------+-------+-----+-----+-----·-	----··--
x
-----------------<------+-----,    .	,. "--·---··--·····
x
'------------+-----  ------+·--------··-------··--··· -
:
-	- -----ii
x	!
ll:J{HIBl'.fS SUBMITTED TO THt'._	-	1
I	OIWFR /\l'POINTINU Tl II' BO/\lrn	. ---- ,
2	/\1'1'1 1( '/\TION H>R Rl'.V ll'W _l_!:J>I  ( ·1 1	-(-===   -- 1
3	l ..FTTFR 01' NOTIFICATION	-- --.. ------------ [
4	lil{ll:F OF 1'1-'.RSONNLI FI LI '.
('OlJNSl· .'S Rt·:l.l·./\SI·: TO Tl II\ tm/\Rj)"-----··---··"--·---··1
/\DDITIO.N/\I. EXI llBITS SUBMITI l•J);\0r THvti-:-(ff'·-·------- -­
l'ERSON/\I. i\Pl'l·:/\R/\ N( T

----·------------------------------- ·_1 _l_f__R_F<__C1R_ _1>_1_N_<i_<J_l'_l_'l_l{_._ N/\l./\PPl i\R/\	1
111·. \ltl'>(; ll.\TF	CASE NUMBER

25 M ay 2006

FD-2005-00424	I

1                 .....,. . ,-::-  ''"·'"c".,,.,,...":'."' s','1"": ,_,,.,""1',..."'"1"'"il:".":..,.,c-:"J",.,...C) '.l...,"''". ·"1'=:1-"A"L"1"!:1\'n"""o"11".1A'""J.-A""R"E" 1> 1St:!µ'!s$Jlilr,.@"""N.· ..'·T.,.1,1'1";"/":\-l:::T::l.,\.(,"f'"1"1".1"1"1'"1'"J.7lt'.'"J'.,,... .1'K'lJ,,.l.,">"l'.M'"'."l:l-'"t"1'"R"("ll'"i"'"1u'":v""1'1.."W".,.,f,j,{,',.)'"/'.l":R'.''.':" ll"F""<". ·"1,i-;1'0""N". "",\!"".""R"A""r"'"1'"u"N".-\'1"J'".""	1
1	7	7 7	7
I   Ad v ise appl i ca nt of t he decision of the Boa rd, the right to a personal appea rance wi t h/wi L hou l cou nsel , and t he ri gh t 10	I
1 -, u brnit an appl i ca t ion to t he AFBCMR

II

Na1rn:s a nd voles wi l l be made available lo the applicant at t he appl ica nt's req uest.	I
I

I	!

1..:-=--------'r-- - - - - -·.::;.;-- - - - - - - - - ""iN :M- - - - - "- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i>A"·r•:i"siS01im1.6;..	1
I ·"'	Si\I - I--; -----"----- --- --	--- · ···· · ···· ·· ······ · ·· ····	----  .....   FKO\-  - ····-r·;:    l,;)i K ;K. -· ( --,.. ;;:;; t,N,;1.((-):;.!:.	-- -------- -	11
,_,(I (' s IRIJ·:T WISL SLllTI·: 40	1;JH'0'11MAND DK. FI·• Wl'H;..ll{IJFLOOK	I
Ri\ N I )( >I .Pl I i\l·H. TX 7k I )().4742	ANDREWS AFU. MD 207(>2·7002	I
··-·--------------------------------      ------------------------	I

AFHQ FORM 0-2077,.J AN 00	(EF-V2)

Previous cu i tilln will be w;cd

AIR FORCE  DISCHARGE  REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL  RATIONALE	CASE Nl!M llEI{

l<'D-2005-00424	

GEN ERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to general

The appl i cant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (OR B) but decl i ned t o exercise t his right.

The allached brief contains available pertinent data on the appl icant and t he factors leading to the discharge.

FI N DIN GS: Upgrade of d ischarge is denied.

The  Board  finds  that  neither  the  evidence  of  record  nor  that  prov ided  by  t he  applicant  substant iates warran ting an act of clemency.

ISSUE: A ppl ican t received a Bad Cond uct Discharge via the sentence of a Special Cou rt Mart ial

The appl ican t received a Bad Conduct Discharge, a pu nit ive discharge, as part or his sente nce resulti ng from
a Special Cou rt-Martial conviction for, on divers occasions, commilli ng carnal knowledge, and for
w rongfu lly provid ing alcohol ic beverages to a juvenile fifteen years of age. Under the provisions of Section  1 553, I 0 USC, the only basis for a change of a Bad Cond uct discharge is clemency. The appl icant prese n ted no evidence w hich the ORB could consider to warrant granting clemency.

CONCLUSIONS:	The Discharge  Review  Board  concludes that  the d ischarge  was consistent  wit h  t he proced u ral and substant ive req u irements of the discharge regulation and was wi t hi n the d iscretion or the
d i scharge aut hority and that the applicant was provided full adm i nistrative due process.

l"lw IJischargc Review Board concluded that the appl icant's punit i ve d ischarge by Special Court-Ma rt ial i s appropri ate u nde r the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of
clemency, for change of discharge.

Attachment: Exam i ner's Brief