------  ---- -------------------------------------------------------- -
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REV IEW BOARD HEARING  RECORD

\' \!\IF OF SEl<VIC'E M EM BER (LAST, FIRST MlllllLE INITIAL)	GRADE
·'----------------------,'	SRA

AliSN/SSAN

-' -------------­'

-

---·-··---·-	-· .._,.·     ----------------------r----,--------- -

'I- '	""

PERSONAL     APPEARANCE	x

RECORD  REVIEW

-----------------+--   ' ------------------------+- +-------- ---------·------·· "'' ...

1	c_l'N_s'k_  _ >,;,"IE OF COl'NSl-:I. AND OR ORC;ANIZATION

AIJI>RESS ANIJ OR ORGANIZATION OF COl':>i'>EL

ii	x
;-  - -   ---  -----'------------------------- "-
M EMBER SITTING
----    ------------------------------------	---------------1-- llON ---

VOTE OF THE BOARL>

UFN -+-lJOTI IC -+
x

' ----------------+-- ---+-- --+--- --+-------·----+- -
I	x
1--- -------------+-- --+--- 1--- --+---  ----· --- --------

n

r
--	-
u

! :

I '

1

"-"-"r"-	-----+---------- 	 .

.--- - x --

!  1     1 1

Ir_'!·-·-· -....·_ .......
" '-'	A9-t.53

1N111-:x NliMI 1-:R	A 61.00	oim	::	:	>	HEBo ARU    --=_-_:,

2	Al'l'l.ICAI ION l·OR  Rl'Vll· :W OI· DISCI 11\IHil·	1
3	l.FITER OF NOTIHCA'llON
l---+---------------------------------  -   -
4	llRIFF OI'  PFRSONNLl.  1.-ILl.-
t---+	-------------- " ··.. -----·--··
COUNSFI :s Rl·LLASE TO Tiii·: BO/\RI>
ADDITIONAi l'XlllBITS SUBMITTl'.I> Al Tlf\11 of:- - -
PERSONAL  Al'Pl·:ARANC 'F	II
TAPI· Rl·:COIWINCi OF l'FRS< lNAI  Al'l'l-1\lA·N-C	1

I

--1

fl---- -:---,----,-'-,-:-;---·- ·;-:-,-- ---·---·---..----·----  --+--::;:;: 42s-------------1    -+-- -------------------.·--·--.	i

I     -\1'1'1 !<  AN I S lS\!1. ANIJ  1 111. IJOAl(D'  l)H'ISIONAL  RATIONAL ARE DJSCUSSl\f) <lN'l'lltl   1')'1\!:tll(D l\fk l-'OR\'E  DISl'llAR\;E  lll'VILW l!OAlIJ Dl-J"ll(INAL RAl"lON:\l.11•

Ca-.;e heard a t Wash i ngton, D.C.

1\dvisc appl ica n t or t he decision of the Board, t he righ t to a personal appearance wit h/without cou nsel, and t he righ t to
-;11h111i t an applicat ion to t he AFBCMR

Na111e-.; and voles wi l l be made available to the applicant at the applicant·s req uest.

'l<·'-Al l'ltF OF I<  .-
1· - - - - - - - - - - - -
''
·------	-	INOORSE,M...,E."N' T - _,,_- - -  - ---- --- ------------  
--	FR__l 1:--------

IO;

                                                                                             SECRETARY  OF Tiff  AIU  FOR< 'E PEUSON"°El. l'Ol'N('IL

j

40

,_- _'ii) (" S IRITT WFST. SlJITI·:	AIR FORCE lllSl'llARGE REVIEW llOARD 1535 l'OMMA:"ll DR. EE WING,.IRIJ FLOOU
R.\ N DDl.1'11 :\Fii, TX 71\ l'i0--1742	A:>ilJREWS Ml!,MIJ l076l-7002

I, _	,,,,,	_ _ _	c	_ _ _ _ _ _	_

AFH Q FOR M 0-2077, J AN 00	(EF-V2)	Previous cd ilion wi ll hi: uscd

CON  CLUSIONS:	The Discha rge Review  Board concl udes that t he d ischa rge was consiste nt wi t h the proced ura l  and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was wit hin the discret ion or t h..:
d ischarge au thori ty and t hat the applicant was provided full adm inistrat ive due process.

I n v iew of t he foregoing findings, the Board further concludes lhat there exists no legal or equita ble basis ror
u pgrade of d ischarge, t hus the applicant" s discharge should not be changed .

Attachme n t:
Ex aminer's Brief

A lR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUM BER

FD-2005-00428	

G EN ERAL:  The appl ican l appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The appl icant was of h:red a pe rsonal appearance before the Discharge Review Boa rd (ORB) but decl ined to exercise this right.

The attached b rief contai ns avail able pertinent data on the applica nt and the factors leadi ng to the discharge.

FIN DI NGS:  Upgrade of d ischa rge is denied.

The Boa rd finds t hat nei ther the evidence of record nor t hat prov ided by the appl ican t substa n tiates a11
i neq u i t y or i mpropriety that would justify a change of discha rge.

ISSU E:  A ppl icant recei ved a General discharge for M isconduct - Civilia n Convict ion

Appl icant contends d ischarge was ineq uitable because i t was based on one isolated inciden t i n his 57 mont h:-. of service and t here was no judicial action and one year unrestricted probation.  The records i nd icated t he appl ican t received two Letters of Repri mand and one Letter of Cou nsel ing for miscond uct to incl ude
rece i v i ng a t icket for fail ing to slop at a stop sign and then not notifyi ng his supervisor, speed ing on base
fou r L i mes i n a I 0 month period, and for bei ng arrested by civilia n authorities for felony burglary of a vc hick
<111d grand thef t. The records indicate that applica nt pleaded no contest at his fi nal court appearance and was sen te nced t o two years probat ion with no restrictions. Additionall y, applicant waived his right to an
adm i n ist rati ve d ischarge board , contingent on his receivi ng no less than a General discharge. The Board opi ned that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ampl e opportu ni ties Lo change his
negat ive behav ior and the fact that his civilian conviction sentence was u nrestricted probation was w ithou t me rit. The Board concl uded t he miscond uct was a significa n t depart ure from cond uct expected of al l
in i l i tary me m bers, and the characterization of lhe discha rge received by t he applica nt was found to be appropr i ate.