AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

-- --- -----

N\M E ( W SERV ICE MEMBER (L;\ST, FIRST MIDl>LE INITIAL)

l1RADE

.'------------------------------ ' '

AMN

::::::::::::::]

·' ·-=i··--·(_x ; -··--_-. -;r--.· .--'-"-i -=- p.-...E'l{ SON_A_L_A_P_P_EA_RA N_C_E--------+-x---,1--RE_(_:O_R_D_RE_-_v 1_-E=W===-=--=--=- --------..-...._.,   _,  , ,, ,

 	n _Jl...,'N._s_..:1_.__,  ;<.,\\H: 01' l'Ol;NSEI. ASIJ Ok OkGANIZATION	AI>DRES' A1'Il OR OR(;_\'.'l/IL\TION OF ( 'OUiSEI_ 1
r""'	·	I

MEMBER      SITTING	·· - .... .. _ _

_  _ _v_oT-F!H_KOAim _ _

_ -----·	·1

I--;:-:- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- --- --- --- --- --- ---·	llON	Gl'N	LIO lllC	01 ll FR	_,, _l  ---1

I :	:		
I	i---	-----------1-	---+---	---+---	-	

X	I
- --..--- - -x	I
11·	-;--1
t:.	-·- ------- !
I      .	---·	1

'--------------------------------------------- ·
AlJ4.5J	J'>illt:X NUMllER

A67.90

A	I
I
EXHIBll'S SUBMIITED TO THE BOARD	--· ,,_  - 1
·- ---	-1
ORDH{ APl'OIN l'IN(; Tl IL BOARD
l--0--+----------------..·---- ----------

2	i\l'Pl.ICA'llON  H)R  RFV IFW  OF DISCllAR< ;t
J	I FITl'.I{ 01· NOTll11< 'i\TION
!------+- ------------·---  ------·--·
4	BRIFF OF PFRSONNl'I I'll.I'
couNsu:s RLLLAs11 TO TI 11: WMR1 i	I
I	A1m1T10NA1       1'x11mrrs  suBMT1'TFffA'rT1K1r:·oF	_ _ 1

I_
I  Iii' \l<I:\(; ll.\TL
25 l\1a)  2006

l'ASE NUMllER

FD-2005-00431

PFRSONAI. i\Pl'l·:i\RAN< 'I'	!
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAi ,\P'17i·:'.;:"N --=--	I
I
I

\t'l'I I< .\N 1 ·i'LIL /\NI >  1111. l<Ol\lW' l)JOC!MONl\L Rl\TJONl\L /\RE OlSCUSSEr>ON Tiff' l\'ITl\CJlhll 1\11< l'()lt<l' l)/SC:lll\JWh Rl'.VlliW 1)!11\IW J'>l:l 'lIONl\L RAl'lON/\1 1:

Case hea rd a t Wash ington, D.C.

1\ d vi sc appl i can t of the decision of t he Board, the right to a personal appearance wit h/wit hout cou nsel, and t he ri gh t to su hm i t an appl icat ion to t he AFBCMR

Na mes and vot es w i l l be made available to t he applicant at t he applicant"s request.

------	--.........	/ "  '\	/'
'" •N \Tl l<L OF m-:nm   -	l	.1 s1<:NAJTRF <}F RO,\RJJ PRl;s!OENT   ,,,-?	------     I	/7	/
.- ................... .....;. ............................. --.;.	.................... _1_ .i._.r............a ..........,..j ... .....	... .... .l	7
''	''
 '--------c:-:::------;:z	------.,--- ----------------------------------   -;,:.:i!"i	-HH-

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-Y2)	Previous eJi lion will he u eJ

Al I{ FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	

FD-2005-00431	

GEN ERAL:  The appl icant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The appl ican t was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) bu t decl ined lo
exercise L his right.

The attached brief contains avail able perti nent data on the appl icant and the factors lead ing to the discharge. FINDI N GS:  Upgrade of d ischarge is denied.
The Board  finds t ha l nei t her t he evidence of record nor that provided  by t he applicant substa n t iates a n i neq u i t y or i m propriet y that would justif y a change of discharge.

ISSU E:

A ppl ica n t submitted no issues. The Records indicated the appl icant received two Article 15s and one Lel1e r
or Repr i mand for miscond uct to incl ude underage drinking w hile i n the presence of minor females w hom he
had i nvi ted to his on-base quarters, a l lowing three females to reside in his on-base residence w hile his wife
\Vas awa y a l Technical School, and committi ng of adultery. The OR B opined that t hrough these
adm i nist ra tive actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board conclu ded t he m iscond uct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all mi l i tary members and the characteriza t ion of the discharge received by the appl ican t was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concl udes that the discharge  was consistent  w i l h  l hc proced u ral and substantive req uirements of the d ischarge regulat ion and was within t he discretion of Ihe d ischa rge au t hority and tha t the appl icant was provided full administrative due process.

111 v iew or lhe foregoing findi ngs the Board further concl udes that there exists no legal or eq u i tabl e basis for u pgrade of d ischarge, t hus t he applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Exam i ner's Brief