AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRAOK	AFSN/SSAN

f-------------------

SRA

:--------------·' ''" - - --

TYPE HON	PERSONAL  APPEARANCE

x	RECORD  REVIEW

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

x

MEMBER SITTING

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

HON	GEN	UOTHC

OTHER	DENY

X*
X* X* X*
X*
'
'"-----------------------------------

ISSUES

A93.19 A93.09

INDEX NUMllER

A49.00

I    I	ORDER APPOINTING THF BOARD
2	APPUCA TION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3	LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4	BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADD!TI   NAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HE

HEARING DATE	CASE NUMBER

19 Sep 2006	FD-2006-00037

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's req uest.
* Reason and Authority

S<lF..111!CQQQ1!Qt ••••••• /.1:..£ •• L.......2.......L<....J SUiNA:IJIRF <lF..U04lllllllll.ilN'!:II •••/. ••••••••': ••••••••••

SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLl'lf AFB, TX 78150-4742

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE R:vrnw BOARD
ISJS COMMAND OR, EE WING, JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(Ef- V2)	Previous edition will be used

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2006-0003 7	

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for discharge.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS:  Request for change ofreason and authority for discharge is denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

Issue 1. Applicant has expressed his desire for changing the reason and authority for discharge to allow for reenlistment into the armed forces.  The records indicate the applicant was discharged for Unsatisfactory Performance on February 5, 1999. A review of his Point Summary indicates from October 17, 1998 to February 5, 1999, the applicant did not complete a satisfactory retirement year.  The DRB concluded the reason and authority of discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

Issue 2.   The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has a good job.  However, no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing.

CONCLUSIONS:  The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substanti ve requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for changing the reason and authority for discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief