AIR FORCE DISCHARGE  REVIEW BOARD HEARING  RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, Fl RST MIDDLE INITIAL)	GRADE	AFSN/SSAN

'	'	AlC	'.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _',

;------------------------------- .	·------------- ·

·

'   ------------------------------- '	'	'
TYPE   GEN	I	PERSONAL  APPEARANCE	x	I	RECORD  REVIEW
COUNSEL	NAME OF COUNSF;L ANP OR ORGANIZATION	ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES	No
x
VOTE OF THE BOARD

MEMBER SITTING

··-· "' '"'""·· " ..,. ·""·· "'" ''•''" . ......	.. .......	.....
HON	GEN	UOTl lC	OTl lER	DENY
-    ----------------------------------- ''
'''	x
''

---.

'''	x
''
'''	x
''
'''	x
''
'''	x
''
SSllES	A94.53	INDEX NIJMBER	A67.10	EXHIBITS  SUBMITTED TO THE  BOARD
1	ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2	APPLICATION  FOR  REVIEW OF DISCHARGE	-
3	LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4	BRI EF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXI llBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE R ECORDI NG OF PERSONAL APPEARA NCE HE

llRARING  DAH	CASE NUMBER

19 Sep 2006	FD-2006-00039
APPLICANT'S ISSUE ANO mr liOAIU)'S Dl!Cl' IONAL ll.ATIONAL ·AIU\·DISCIJSSllD ON Tiii! ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHAROE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
·I•· :/ »'·• /:·• 1	.,.	•	•
Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel , and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR

Names and votes wi l l be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.

tcJt QJliF.;CQ!lQF.;l! _d_ _ _ _ _ 22._ t-.. ff _ _ _ _ _ _ _·"'-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J SLG!iA1J11u;.Qi::u06iurllt:6.£L'lr _ _ z/:._ _ _ _ _ •-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
'	'
''	''
l	''
...'... - •- - - ••- •••.- ----- - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - iND'6ifE'NT- - - - - - --- -------- .,...•- ----------------------- - --i>l'ffr -!li25ii'lll16'

TO:	t'l<.OM:
SAF/MRBR	SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, JRD FLOOR

RANDOLPH  AFB, TX 781 50-4742	ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762- 7002

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-V2)	Previous ed ition wi l l be used

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2006-00039	

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the available service record.  The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge.  The records indicated the applicant received three Letters of Reprimand and three AETC Form 341 's for misconduct.  The applicant was administratively disciplined for violation of dress and appearance standards, insubordinate conduct and disrespect towards NCO's, Phase Violations, failure to obey an order, failure to go and failed room inspection.  The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior.  The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all mi litary members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS:   The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief