AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING  RECORD

NAME OJ<' SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE  INITIAL)	GRADE	A.FSN/SSAN

..--------------------------------- .

Al C	:--------------

-- ----------------.---------;-,----------------------------- ------t--        ,--    - -------<'-------------·-----:------<

TYPE   GEN	I	PERSONAL  APPEARANCE	x	I

RECORD  REVIEW

1-...._,,,,,.,,,,,..,.,- --1------------------------------t---l------------------------j

cOUNSL
1--------1
YES	No
x

NAMF; OF COUNSEL ANll OR ORGANIZATION

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIMTION OF COll NSEL

VOTE OF THE BOARD
1----,--c-.............. ._,.,...- ---,-- --

MEMBER SITTING
f.--------------------------------1.

l lON

GEN

UOTHC

OTllb:R

Db:NY

x

..	..	x
r--.!	·...------------------+--------+-----1------+-----+-----­
-!

.
-!...
-!..

x
x x
--------------------------------J

ISSUES

A94.05

INDEX NUMBER

A67.90

EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
1	OR Dr:R APPOINTING THE BOARD
2	APPLICATION FOR R b:VIEW OF DISCHARGE
3	LETTER OF NOTI FICATION
l---+-------------------------
4	HRIEF OF PERSONN EL rll.E
!---+---------------------- ·-···
COUNSEL'S Rl-:1.LASr: TO THE BOA R D
A L)J)ITIONA L EXHIBITS sui3'Mn=--, 1;;=n A - , ,I M E. OF----·-·-- PERSONAL  APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDfNG OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARJNG

HEARING DATE	CASE NUMBER

08 Mar 2007	FD-2006-00361
APPl.ICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARB DISCUSSED ON THE AlTACHED AIR FORCE D!SCHAROE REVIEW BOAIUJ Dl!CISIONAl RATIONALE

Case heard in Washi ngton, D.C.

Ad vise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes wi ll be made avai lable to the applicant at the appl icant's req uest.

-----··:J_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
..

...--	------ -1

..---- -- --- --- --- --- ----- --- --- --- --- -- --- --;	r- --- --- ·r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ..-. -ff;:.E: 31912001

SAF/MRRR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOT.PH AFB, TX 78150-4742

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE  PERSONNEL  COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762- 7002

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-V2)	Previous edition will be used

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2006-00361	

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but decl ined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available perti nent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant  substantiates  an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant contends her discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh  and based  on one isolated incident in her career. The records indicated the applicant received four Letters of Reprimand and three Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct. The misconduct included lying  to  supervisor, financial irresponsibility, inappropriate behavior, failure to comply with standards, violation of medical quarters, substandard duty performance, and making a false official  statement.  The  DRB  opined  that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her negative behavior. The Board concluded the  misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all mi l itary members.  The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was  within the  discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief