AIR FORCE DISCHARGE  REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FLRST MIDDLE INITlAL)	GRADE	AFSN/SSAN

AlC
X	RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

X*+

X*+ X*+ X*+

ISSUES

A95.00
AOl.00

INDEX !\UMBER

l ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2	APPLICATION fOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3	LETTER Of NOTIFJCA TION
4	BRJ EI' 01' PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING  or PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING  DATE	CASE NUMBER

27 May 2010	FD-2009-00065

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the appl icant's request

*Reason and Authority
+Reenlistment

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00

(EF-V2)

Previous

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2009-00065	

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS:  The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge..

ISSUES:

Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of her discharge.  The applicant does express a desire to have her discharge upgraded so that she may be eligible to serve her country in the Air National Guard.  The record indicates the applicant received an Article 15 and a Letter of Reprimand for misconduct.	misconduct included moving in with her supervisor while both members were married to other people, failure to obey a lawful order, failing to maintain a professional relationship with her  supervisor, making a false official statement and soliciting to a witness to make a false statement.  The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her behavior.  They found the seriousness of the will ful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance.  The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity
to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

CONCLUSIONS:   The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief