AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL DOCUMENT  
	CASE NUMBER

 FD-2020-00165	
					
GENERAL:  The applicant was discharged on 10 May 2007 in accordance with AFI 36-3208 with a(n) Entry Level/Uncharacterized discharge for Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards.  The applicant appealed for an upgrade of her discharge characterization to Honorable, a change to the discharge narrative reason, and a change to the reenlistment eligibility code.  The board was conducted on 28 Apr 2020.  

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), but declined and requested the board be completed based on a records only review.  

The applicant was not represented by counsel.    

The attached examiner’s brief (provided to applicant only), extracted from available service records, contains pertinent data regarding the circumstances and character of the applicant’s military service. 
  
FINDING:  The DRB voted unanimously to deny the applicant’s request to upgrade her discharge characterization to Honorable.

However, the board voted unanimously to approve a change to the discharge narrative reason to Secretarial Authority and to change the reenlistment eligibility code to “2C.”

DISCUSSION:  The DRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the narrative reason for discharge if such changes are warranted.  If applicable, the board can also change the applicant’s reenlistment eligibility code.  In reviewing discharges, the board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant.  The board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to determine if the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.  

The applicant contended the discharge was inequitable/improper because she was pressured to sign an Entry Level separation after being injured during training.  She notes that she should have received the option of an MEB and that the narrative reason is unjust and inaccurate.  The applicant believe that if she met the MEB, then she would have received a more favorable DD214, and medical coverage through the VA.  The applicant states that she has been rated from the VA after hiring a lawyer to prove that her injuries were service connected.  She insists the narrative reason is inaccurate because she met all of the medical/physical requirements when she entered military service. 

In accordance with AFI 36-3208, Airmen are in entry level status during the first 180 days of continuous active military service.  If separated during this time, they normally receive an Entry Level Separation that is not characterized.  Because it is Air Force policy to not characterize this type of separation, the applicant’s request to “upgrade” it to Honorable could not be approved.  

CONCLUSION:  

The board found neither the evidence of record, nor that provided by the applicant substantiated any inequity.  However, sufficient evidence existed to convince the board the discharge was improper due to an error fact, law, procedure and/or discretion.  Therefore, the board determined the discharge narrative reason was more accurately described as “Secretarial Authority” and the reenlistment eligibility code was changed to “2C.”  The board did not change the characterization due to the Entry Level discharge policy.    

The DRB results were approved by the board president on 11 May 20.  If desired, the applicant can request a list of the board members and their votes by writing to:  

Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attn: Discharge Review Board
3351 Celmers Lane
Joint Base Andrews, NAF Washington, MD 20762-6602  

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief (Applicant Only)