RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080001333 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Chairperson Member Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. 2. The applicant states, in effect, that on or about September 1970 while patrolling a village in Vietnam and manning a machine gun on a truck he was injured. He contends that he was hit by an object in his back on his right shoulder blade, that he had to be medically evacuated for treatment, and that he was treated for a week and sent back to his unit. He also states that he has no paperwork for this incident. 3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted on 5 September 1969 for a period of 3 years.. He arrived in Vietnam on 13 April 1970. He served as a tank turret repairman assigned to Headquarters and Company A, 704th Maintenance Battalion of the 4th Infantry Division in Vietnam from 25 April 1970 through 29 November 1970. He was assigned to Company D, 1st Battalion, 77th Armor, 1st Brigade of the 5th Infantry Division in Vietnam from 14 December 1970 through 17 March 1971. On 12 August 1971, the applicant was honorably discharged in the rank of specialist four after completing 1 year, 11 months, and 8 days of creditable active service with no time lost. 3. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Army Commendation Medal, two awards of the Overseas Service Bar, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bars (M-14 and M-16) as authorized awards. 4. There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. 5. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. 6. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal. His records show he received conduct and efficiency ratings of “excellent” throughout his service. 7. Records show the applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. 8. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows the applicant's unit (704th Maintenance Battalion) is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 52, dated 1971. 9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 10. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 was not disqualifying. However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in General Orders. 11. Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. 2. The applicant was separated in the rank of specialist four with 22 months of creditable active service with no time lost. It appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 5 September 1969 through 12 August 1971 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. 3. The applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars. 4. The applicant’s unit (704th Maintenance Battalion) was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation while he was assigned to it. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF JM_____ ___CD_ __QS____ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 5 September 1969 through 12 August 1971; and b. adding the Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and three bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. 2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Purple Heart. __ jm________ CHAIRPERSON ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080001333 5 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4508