IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 May 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090002174 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. 2. The applicant states, in effect, that he did not know these awards were missing until his recent look at his DD Form 214. 3. The applicant provides, in support of his application, a copy of his Purple Heart certificate. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. On 25 February 1969, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years. He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). 3. On 4 July 1969, the applicant departed Fort Lewis, Washington for duty in the Republic of Vietnam. 4. On 10 August 1969, the applicant was assigned for duty as a rifleman with Company B, 1st Battalion, 6th Infantry Regiment, 198th Infantry Brigade. 5. A casualty message, dated 11 November 1969, reported that the applicant had been not seriously wounded by an enemy mine on 10 November 1969, while en route to a night defensive position. He suffered fragment wounds to his left eye, left lobe, both legs, and abdomen. 6. The Vietnam Casualty Roster also shows that the applicant was not seriously wounded in action on 10 November 1969. 7. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart or the Combat Infantryman Badge pertaining to the applicant. 8. On 15 November 1969, the applicant was medically evacuated from the Republic of Vietnam. 9. On 14 March 1970, the applicant was assigned for duty at Fort Riley, Kansas. 10. On 24 February 1971, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation. He had attained the rank of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 and had completed 2 years of creditable active duty service. 11. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with [M-14 and M-16] Rifle Bar, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar. It does not show award of the Purple Heart or the Combat Infantryman Badge. 12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 13. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. 14. U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation Number 672-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, specifically governed award of the Combat Infantryman Badge to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. This regulation specifically stated that criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and the Combat Infantryman Badge is the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service. Further, "the Combat Infantryman Badge is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day to day combat." This regulation also stated the Combat Infantryman Badge was authorized for award to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. Appendix V of this regulation provided the guidance governing award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Paragraph 2a stated, in effect, that MOS's "in the 11 series with the letters B, C, D, F, G, and H," are infantry MOS's. 15. Review of the applicant's records indicates entitlement to additional awards and decorations that are not shown on his DD Form 214. 16. Special Orders Number 118, U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, dated 28 April 1969, awarded the applicant the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar. 17. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency rating through his tenure of service. The applicant’s records do not contain any evidence of disciplinary action. There is no evidence to show that the commander took any action to deny him the Army Good Conduct Medal. 18. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying. Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying. 19. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, but it does not show that he was awarded any bronze service stars to signify campaign participation credit. Paragraph 2-13 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in. Table B-1 contains a list of Vietnam campaigns, and it shows that during the applicant's tour in Vietnam, he participated in the Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 and the Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970 campaigns. 20. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in the Republic of Vietnam. This publication shows that the 6th Infantry Regiment, during the time of the applicant's assignment, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Department of the Army General Orders Number 42, dated in 1972. 21. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).  This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.  Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant contends, in effect, that he was awarded the Purple Heart and Combat Infantryman Badge; and that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards. 2. There are no general orders available that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart. However, the applicant's records contain a copy of the casualty message identifying his wounds and his name is listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. This evidence corroborates the Purple Heart Certificate provided by the applicant that shows he was wounded in action on 9 November 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected to show this award. 3. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size while assigned in the Republic of Vietnam. Furthermore, the evidence clearly shows that he was wounded by an enemy mine while performing a combat mission. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and correction of his records to show this award. 4. The applicant’s records clearly show that he distinguished himself in the performance of his military service. Therefore, it is presumed that his not receiving an Army Good Conduct Medal for his service was an oversight. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and correction of his records to show this award. 5. Records show that the applicant participated in two campaign periods during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, he is eligible for award of two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. 6. Records show that the applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this foreign award. 7. The applicant's unit was cited in general orders for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this foreign unit award. 8. Special Orders show that the applicant was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. BOARD VOTE: ____X___ ____X___ ____X__ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 25 February 1969 to 24 February 1971; c. awarding the applicant the Combat Infantryman Badge effective 10 November 1969; and d. adding to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Purple Heart, Army Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Combat Infantryman Badge, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. __________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090002174 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090002174 6 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1