IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 June 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004127 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. 2. The applicant states that he served his country well, that he was a great Soldier. Circumstances beyond his control led to his discharge. While he was deployed, his wife was not paying the bills which got him into trouble. He did not know that the discharge could be upgraded. 3. The applicant provides no additional documentation to substantiate his request. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) and entered active duty on 22 November 1983. He completed training as a wheeled vehicle repairer and progressed normally. He reenlisted on 4 November 1986, in pay grade E-4. 3. On 20 February 1990, the applicant was recommended for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Separations), chapter 14, with a general discharge due to acts or a pattern of misconduct. The letter of notification cited the following as the basis for consideration: "Discreditable involvement with civil and military authorities (DUI 2nd Charge, implied consent, failure to stop for an accident, no proof of insurance, driving too fast for conditions)." These offenses occurred in Hinesville, Georgia on 1 January 1990. Attached documents referred to counseling statements, nonjudicial punishment and a letter of reprimand for missing formations, repeated over indulgence in alcohol, and driving on post with an illegal blood alcohol level. 4. The applicant consulted with counsel and voluntarily waived his right to have a board of officers consider his case, provided he received no worse than a general discharge. He indicated that he was not submitting statements in his own behalf. 5. The separation authority approved the recommendation, directed a general discharge, and waived any rehabilitation requirements because such action was unlikely to produce a quality Soldier. 6. The applicant was accordingly separated on 12 April 1990 with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. 7. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the Soldier’s overall record. 8. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant's contentions have been noted and carefully considered. However, neither the evidence submitted by the applicant nor the evidence of record supports his contentions.  Clearly the applicant's own behavior led to his discharge. 3. The discharge process was in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the applicant's service was appropriately characterized. 4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The record does not contain any evidence and the applicant failed to submit any evidence that would satisfy this requirement. 5. In view of the above, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___X____ ___X___ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090004127 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090004127 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1