BOARD DATE: 1 July 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090021743 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. 2. The applicant states: * he had no say in his discharge * he believes his discharge should be upgraded to honorable due to psychiatric health problems he received during his duty in Iraq * due to fighting in Iraq he became unstable * he had problems adjusting to daily life * he was hospitalized due to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and sleep problems (nightmares) * he couldn't concentrate due to flashbacks of Iraq * irritability caused his bad behavior 3. The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 June 2006 for a period of 3 years. He trained as a cavalry scout. He served in Iraq from 13 March 2007 to 15 May 2008. 2. On 18 November 2008, the applicant's unit commander initiated separation proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (commission of a serious offense). He based his recommendation for separation on the following: numerous failures to repair, being drunk on duty, and assault. This recommendation indicates the applicant received nonjudicial punishment on 4 May 2007 (punishment consisted of reduction to E-1 and extra duty) and on 27 September 2007 (punishment consisted of extra duty). No other details are available. 3. The applicant consulted with counsel, waived his rights, acknowledged that he might encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if a discharge under other than honorable conditions were issued, and elected not to submit a statement on his own behalf. 4. There is no evidence of record which shows he was diagnosed with any mental or medical condition prior to this discharge. He underwent a mental status evaluation and physical examination. He was found qualified for separation on 21 October 2008. 5. On 4 December 2008, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. 6. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 10 December 2008 with a discharge under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (commission of a serious offense). He had served a total of 2 years, 6 months, and 3 days of creditable active service. 7. On 29 October 2009, the Army Discharge Review Board upgraded the applicant's discharge to a general discharge. 8. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from active duty. Chapter 14, in effect at the time, established policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories included minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, conviction by civil authorities, and abuse of illegal drugs. The issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally considered appropriate. However, the separation authority could direct a general discharge if such was merited by the member's overall record. 9. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded to honorable due to psychiatric health problems he received during his duty in Iraq. However, there is no evidence of record which shows he was diagnosed with any mental condition prior to his discharge. 2. The applicant’s record of service included two nonjudicial punishments. As a result, his record of service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. 3. The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights. He had an opportunity to submit a statement in which he could have voiced his concerns and he failed to do so. 4. The type of discharge directed and the reasons were therefore appropriate considering all the facts of the case. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___x_____ ____x____ ____x_ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090021743 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090021743 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1