BOARD DATE: 6 September 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110004305 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that his character of service was “honorable.” 2. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 shows his service was uncharacterized and he desires it to reflect that it was “Honorable” because it inhibits his ability to utilize his veteran's benefits. 3. The applicant provides a letter explaining his application, his DD Form 214, an Honorable Discharge Certificate, and his Chronological Statement of Retirement Points. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in Dallas, Texas on 19 June 1991 for a period of 8 years. He was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) on 4 June 1992 and was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri to undergo one-station unit training as a carpenter and masonry specialist. 3. He completed his training and was released from active duty training on 1 October 1992 due to completion of active duty training. He had served 3 months and 28 days of active service that is uncharacterized. 4. He was returned to his USAR unit in Texas and he continued to serve in the USAR until he was honorably discharged on 23 June 1999. 5. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the policies and procedures for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 4-2, in effect at the time, provides in pertinent part that Army National Guard and USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT while in an entry level status will have uncharacterized service even though they completed their IADT successfully. 6. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant was properly released from IADT with uncharacterized service in accordance with the applicable regulation in effect at the time. 2. While the applicant’s request is understandable, a duly-constituted and properly prepared DD Form 214 is not changed simply to qualify an individual for benefits. 3. An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier's military service. It merely means the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise. 4. Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant his request. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___x___ __x______ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. 2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms. _______ _x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110004305 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110004305 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1