BOARD DATE: 22 November 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110011745 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all awards earned during his service and to show his period of service in Vietnam. 2. He states item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 is not complete and the form does not show his service in Vietnam. He states, in effect, he cannot receive disability benefits without this information on his DD Form 214. 3. He provides his DD Form 214. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 11 May 1966. After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 51B (Carpentry and Masonry Specialist). 3. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 29 (Qualification in Arms) he qualified as a marksman with the M-14 rifle and as a sharpshooter with the M-16 rifle * item 31 (Foreign Service) he was credited with service in Vietnam from 11 April 1967 through 18 December 1968 * item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to duty in Vietnam with Company D, 34th Engineer Battalion (Construction) from 11 April 1967 to 16 December 1968 4. On 19 December 1968, he was honorably released from active duty by reason of early separation of an overseas returnee. Item 24 of the DD Form 214 issued at that time shows the National Defense Service Medal. The DD Form 214 does not show he served in Vietnam. 5. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations. Qualifying service also included temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days in Vietnam or contiguous areas, except that the time limit may be waived for personnel participating in actual combat operations. This same regulation states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each credited campaign. A silver service star is authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars. 6. The Vietnam campaigns are listed in appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22. His record shows his service in Vietnam coincided with six campaigns: * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II (1 July 1966 - 31 May 1967) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III (1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968) * Tet Counteroffensive (30 January - 1 April 1968) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV (2 April - 30 June 1968) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V (1 July - 1 November 1968) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI (2 November 1968 - 22 February 1969) 7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more. Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces. 8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 sets forth requirements for award of basic marksmanship qualification badges. The qualification badge is awarded to indicate the degree – Expert, Sharpshooter, and Marksman – in which an individual has qualified in a prescribed record course. An appropriate bar is furnished to denote each weapon with which the individual has qualified. 9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This pamphlet shows the 34th Engineer Battalion was cited for award of the: * Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) for the period 2 May 1967 to 31 May 1968, by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 39, dated 1970 * RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 3 August 1967 to 19 December 1968, by DAGO 43, dated 1970, as amended by DAGO 11, dated 1973 10. Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. 11. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contained guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214. The regulation did not provide for an entry on the DD Form 214 specifying an individual had served in Vietnam. 12. An interim change to Army Regulation 635-5, dated 15 December 1971, stated to indicate Indochina and Korea service on or after 5 August 1964 in item 30 (Remarks) of the DD Form 124 by entering inclusive dates of service for Vietnam and indicating "Yes" or No" for service in Indochina and Korea. To show Vietnam service only, e.g., enter "Vietnam -- 25 Apr 71 thru 28 May 71, Indochina -- Yes, Korea -- No." DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed a qualifying period of service in Vietnam for award of the VSM, and he participated in six campaigns while serving in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the VSM with one silver service star and one bronze service star. 2. He completed a qualifying period of service in Vietnam for award of the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960). Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. 3. He qualified as a marksman with the M-14 rifle and as a sharpshooter with the M-16 rifle. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). 4. He was assigned to a unit in Vietnam during a period for which it was cited for award of the MUC, RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards. 5. When he was released from active duty, the regulation governing preparation of the DD Form 214 did not require an entry specifying service in Vietnam. However, a later revision of the regulation provided for recording Vietnam service in the "Remarks" section of the form. There would be no harm in adding such an entry to item 30 of his DD Form 214, and it would be appropriate to do so at this time. BOARD VOTE: ___x_____ _x______ ___x___ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * VSM with one silver service star and one bronze service star * RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) * MUC * RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation b. adding to item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry "Vietnam -- 11 Apr 1967 thru 18 Dec 1968, Indochina -- Yes, Korea -- No" _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110011745 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110011745 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1