IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110013436 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect all of his authorized decorations and awards. 2. The applicant states that he desires to have all of his authorized awards reflected on his DD Form 214. 3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 February 1964 for a period of 3 years and training in the food service career management field. He completed his basic training at Fort Ord, California and his advanced individual training as a food service specialist at Fort Lee, Virginia before being transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington. 3. On 23 August 1965 he was transferred to Vietnam with his unit and he served in three campaigns before he departed Vietnam on 27 August 1966 for return to Fort Lewis. 4. On 23 February 1967 he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to his expiration of term of service (ETS). He had served 3 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and the National Defense Service Medal. 5. A review of his official records shows that the applicant had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). 6. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. 7. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of Soldiers for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. It shows that during the applicant's assignment his unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. 8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star, based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in appendix B, will be worn on the appropriate service medal. 9. Service medals and awards are not issued by the ABCMR. However, the applicant may obtain his medals by submitting his request in writing to: National Personnel Records Center, ATTN: Army Reference Branch, 1 Archives Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63138. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant’s contention that he is entitled to additional awards has been noted and appears to have merit. 2. The applicant served in three campaigns while in Vietnam and is entitled to wear three bronze service stars on his VSM. 3. A review of the applicant's records shows he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service and his records contain no derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for the first award of the AGCM. Therefore, it appears that the failure to award him the first award of the AGCM was the result of an administrative error. Accordingly, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 24 February 1964 to 23 February 1967 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. 4. The applicant's unit was also awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit. Accordingly, that unit award should be added to his records at this time as well. BOARD VOTE: ____X____ ____X____ ____X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Deleting the award of the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 * Adding the award of the VSM with three bronze service stars to his DD Form 214 * Awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 24 February 1964 to 23 February 1967 and adding it to his DD Form 214 * Adding the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to his DD Form 214 2. The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms. _______ _ _X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110013436 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110013436 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1