IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 December 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110013478 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). 2. The applicant states he was awarded the ARCOM on 8 March 1972, but it was not included on his DD Form 214. 3. The applicant provides copies of his ARCOM Certificate and Citation. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. Evidence of Record and Background Information: a. On 19 October 1970, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States. He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13B (Field Artillery). b. On 30 June 1971, the applicant departed Fort Stewart, Georgia, for duty in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). c. On 6 August 1971, the applicant was assigned for duty as an assistant gunner with the 2nd Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment. d. The applicant returned to the United States on or about 11 March 1972. e. On 17 March 1972, the applicant was released from active duty. He had attained the rank of specialist four/pay grade E-4 and completed 1 year, 4 months, and 29 days of creditable active duty service. f. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). g. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the same awards listed on his DD Form 214. 3. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) failed to reveal any orders awarding the applicant the ARCOM. ADCARS is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command. 4. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. 5. The citation and certificate provided by the applicant indicate he was awarded the ARCOM for outstanding meritorious service in support of operations against communist aggression during the period from August 1971 to March 1972. Neither document identifies the orders authorizing this medal. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the ARCOM. 2. There are no available orders showing the applicant was awarded the ARCOM. Neither the certificate nor the citation provided by the applicant is sufficient evidence by itself upon which to base a correction of his records. 3. In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X___ ____X___ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110013478 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110013478 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1