IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110015738 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. 2. The applicant states: * the Bronze Star Medal was never entered in his file * he has a photo showing that he was presented the Bronze Star Medal in Saigon in either 1972 or 1973 while he was assigned to the 316th Military Police Company 3. The applicant provides: * photograph * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 September 1971. He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 95B (Military Policeman). The highest rank/grade he attained while on active duty was specialist four/E-4. 3. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. Item 31 (Foreign Service) he was in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 30 March 1972 through 19 February 1973. b. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to Company A and Company B of the 716th Military Police Battalion while assigned in the Republic of Vietnam. c. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) he was awarded the following: * National Defense Service Medal * Sharpshooter Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar and Grenade Bar * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device * Overseas Service Bar 4. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the following in: a. Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) "Vietnam, 10 months and 20 days. b. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) he was awarded the following: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge Rifle M-16 * First Class Qualification Badge (Hand Grenade) c. Item 30 (Remarks) he was in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 30 March 1972 through 19 February 1973. 5. The available records do not show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. 6. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Bronze Star Medal. 7. The applicant provided a photograph of himself receiving a decoration. 8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the BSM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, or while engaged n military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. 9. U. S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) governed the military awards program in Vietnam during the Vietnam War. It stated the Bronze Star Medal may have been awarded for heroism or for meritorious achievement or service which did not involve aerial flight but which was performed in connection with military operations against an armed enemy including combat, support, and supply operations. The approval authority for award of the Bronze Star Medal was generally delegated no lower than brigadier generals in command of separate brigades. However, the records of the Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command show that authority for award of the Bronze Star Medal for service had been delegated to colonels in command of the U.S. Army Support Commands located at Saigon, Cam Ranh Bay, and Qui Nhon and in command of separate engineer brigades in Vietnam assigned to the U.S. Army Engineer Troops (Provisional). 10. Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion. Upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award of or upgrading of a decoration. Based upon such review, the Secretary shall determine the merits of approving the award. 11. The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to: Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN: AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY 40122. The unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the recommended award. A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638. Requests should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents. Supporting evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the facts relative to the request. The burden and costs for researching and assembling supporting documentation rest with the applicant. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant's request for correction of his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal was carefully considered. 2. Although the applicant provided a photograph of himself receiving an award from his superiors this is insufficient evidence for award of the Bronze Star Medal. 3. The evidence of record does not show he was recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal or that an appropriate authority approved a recommendation or announced the award in orders. Accordingly, he is not entitled to correction of his record to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. 4. The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes his heroism or the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___X ___ ___X____ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110015738 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110015738 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1